How to simplify calling a field on a polymorphic field name into one typeclass
问题 In a previous question I asked how a record field can be made polymorphic when using DuplicateRecordFields. I got an excellent answer for this from @user2407038. He answered the question to my initial spec providing one type class per field, but he mentioned that it could all be simplified into one typeclass. (Note: this too can be generalized to a single class with an additional parameter corresponding to the field name; this is probably outside the scope of this question). I'm not sure how