interrupt

Are polling and event-driven programming different words for the same technique?

被刻印的时光 ゝ 提交于 2020-07-18 15:45:23
问题 I studied interrupts vs cyclical polling and learnt the advantages of interrupts that don't have to wait for a poll. Polling seemed to me just like event-driven programming or at least similar to a listener and what the polling does is actually much like listening to input or output. Do you agree or did I misunderstand any crucial difference between polling (cyclical listening) and event-driven programming (also listening with so-called listeners)? 回答1: Nope, quite the contrary interrupt

Volatile member variables vs. volatile object?

亡梦爱人 提交于 2020-05-14 03:52:22
问题 I'm trying to implement a multiple producer (via interrupt), single consumer (via application thread) queue on an embedded target in "MpscQueue.h" below. I'm wondering if I can safely remove the some of the volatile usage below (see inline questions). I would also consider using volatile std::array in place of the C-style buffer_[] shown below, but I was unsure if I could trust its implementation to match the intent of the below. A third alternative would be to mark the MpscQueue object

Volatile member variables vs. volatile object?

拟墨画扇 提交于 2020-05-14 03:51:27
问题 I'm trying to implement a multiple producer (via interrupt), single consumer (via application thread) queue on an embedded target in "MpscQueue.h" below. I'm wondering if I can safely remove the some of the volatile usage below (see inline questions). I would also consider using volatile std::array in place of the C-style buffer_[] shown below, but I was unsure if I could trust its implementation to match the intent of the below. A third alternative would be to mark the MpscQueue object

How do interrupts work in multi-core system?

核能气质少年 提交于 2020-04-08 10:37:43
问题 I want to write code for interrupts of the buttons on Raspberry pi 2. This board uses QUAD Core Broadcom BCM2836 CPU (ARM architecture). That mean, only one CPU is on this board( Raspberry pi 2 ). But I don't know how do interrupts in multi-core system. I wonder whether interrupt line is connected to each core or one CPU. So, I found the paragraph below via Google. Interrupts on multi-core systems On a multi-core system, each interrupt is directed to one (and only one) CPU, although it doesn

running multiple instances of a same interrupt parallely on an SMP system

不羁岁月 提交于 2020-03-06 06:58:06
问题 Is it possible to run multiple instances of a same interrupt simultaneously on a multi processor system in linux? If not possible, why do we need to synchronize between interrupt handlers using spin locks? Thanks Venkatesh 回答1: On a SMP architecture Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller( APIC ) is used to route the interrupts from peripherals to the CPU's. the APIC, based on 1. the routing table (where interrupt affinity is set to a particular processor), 2. priority of the interrupt, 3.

Java多线程之interrupt()的深度研究

心不动则不痛 提交于 2020-03-02 18:50:37
原文地址: http://www.cnblogs.com/carmanloneliness/p/3516405.html 近期学习Java多线程的中断机制,网上的帖子说得很浅,并没深究其原理。看了Java源码,对Java的中断机制有了略深入的理解,在这篇文章中向感兴趣的网友分享下。这篇文章主要通过一个典型例子对中断机制进行剖析。    一:一些概念和重要方法   interrupt status(中断状态):请记住这个术语,中断机制就是围绕着这个字段来工作的。在Java源码中代表中断状态的字段是: private volatile Interruptible blocker ; 对“ Interruptible ”这个类不需要深入分析,对于“blocker”变量有以下几个操作。   1.默认blocker=null;  ®1   2.调用方法“interrupt0();”将会导致“该线程的中断状态将被设置(JDK文档中术语)”。 ®2   3.再次调用“interrupt0();”将会导致“其中断状态将被清除(同JDK文档中术语)” ®3    注:这三点很重要,接下来文章中会用来 ®1 ®2 ®3 代替。 明白了第一点来看下文档中对于中断线程相关方法的描述。   1.public void interrupt();     中断线程。如果线程在调用 Object 类的 wait(

关于java中的interrupt

安稳与你 提交于 2020-03-02 17:15:37
一、概念 java中线程有开始,运行(就绪,运行),阻塞,等待,终止这几种状态。其中在等待的时候可以通过设置中断标志位来唤醒线程。一般情况下等待状态的线程检查到中断标志被置位,则会抛出InterruptedException异常,捕获异常,复位中断标志,可以使线程继续运行。 thread.interrupt() 设置中断标识位 Thread.interrupt() 回复中断标识位 thread.isInterrupted() 返回中断标识位 什么情况下可以使用Interrunpt (1)如果线程在调用 Object 类的 wait()、wait(long) 或 wait(long, int) 方法,或者该类的 join()、join(long)、join(long, int)、sleep(long) 或 sleep(long, int) 方法过程中受阻,则其中断状态将被清除,它还将收到一个InterruptedException异常。这个时候,我们可以通过捕获InterruptedException异常来终止线程的执行,具体可以通过return等退出或改变共享变量的值使其退出。 (2)如果该线程在可中断的通道上的 I/O 操作中受阻,则该通道将被关闭,该线程的中断状态将被设置并且该线程将收到一个 ClosedByInterruptException。这时候处理方法一样

线程的正确停止

二次信任 提交于 2020-03-02 17:04:17
线程停止的几种方式: 线程运行完成,正常停止 执行stop方法,暴力停止,现已弃用 执行interrupt方法,现在使用。 stop方法为什么被弃用? 使用stop方法终止线程会 释放掉此线程锁定的所有的监视器 ,如果线程修改了锁定对象的内容在还没有被正常处理之前线程被终止了。将会造成数据不一致的后果。 例如银行取款的例子:在线程A中进行取款操作,取款操作是一个同步方法,其中共有三个步骤:输入密码,取钱,修改余额。当用户a在输入密码,取钱之后,线程A.stop();线程终止。被修改的余额还没有写回数据库,从而造成数据混乱。 举例说明:首先定义一个操作类Login package com.feng.example; public class Login { private String username="a"; private String password="aa"; synchronized public String getUsername() { return username; } public void setUsername(String username) { this.username = username; } synchronized public String getPassword() { return password; } public void

In Android how to stop a thread that is wating for a new Socket

北城余情 提交于 2020-02-22 13:03:11
问题 I'm developing a software that connects to a server using a Socket; connectionThread = new Thread(new Runnable( ) { public void run() { InetAddress serverAddress = InetAddress.getByName(ip); serverSocket = new Socket(serverAddress, port); //do more stuff } }); connectionThread.start(); When the client does not connect to the server the Thread keeps waiting for the return of the new Socket until timeout is reached. I want to enable the user to cancel that action. I tried then to call

Estimating of interrupt latency on the x86 CPUs

好久不见. 提交于 2020-02-17 13:53:22
问题 I looking for the info that can help in estimating interrupt latencies on x86 CPUs. The very usefull paper was found at "datasheets.chipdb.org/Intel/x86/386/technote/2153.pdf". But this paper opened a very important question for me: how can be defined the delay provided by waiting of completion of the current instruction? I mean delay between recognition of the INTR signal and executing of INTR micro-code. As I remember, the Intel Software developer manual also tells something about waiting