interpreted-language

How does python implement mutual recursion?

你说的曾经没有我的故事 提交于 2019-12-04 02:46:32
Moving to python with C/Java background, I recently had to implement a mutual recursion, but something in python is bothering me: since a python program is interpreted line by line, if I have two functions one after another in the same python file: def A(n): B(n-1) # if I add A(1) here, it gives me an error def B(n): if n <= 0: return else: A(n-1) When the interpreter is reading A , B is not yet defined, however this code does not give me an error TL;DR My understanding is that, when def is interpreted, python adds an entry to some local name space locals() with {"function name": function

Why are Interpreted Languages Slow?

余生颓废 提交于 2019-12-03 18:48:27
问题 I was reading about the pros and cons of interpreted languages, and one of the most common cons is the slowness, but why are programs in interpreted languages slow? 回答1: Native programs runs using instructions written for the processor they run on. Interpreted languages are just that, "interpreted". Some other form of instruction is read, and interpreted, by a runtime, which in turn executes native machine instructions. Think of it this way. If you can talk in your native language to someone,

Why are so many web languages interpreted rather than compiled?

戏子无情 提交于 2019-12-03 17:57:28
问题 Why didn't languages such as C end up being using for web dev? Surely the speed increases from being compiled would be useful for heavy load sites? 回答1: Another good reason is that on a big server execution speed is not so much an issue as the connection speed anyway. Most of the time is spent sending and receiving data, not number crunching. And actually in certain web services which do a lot of computations, the hard crunching is probably run as a compiled program. Plus interpreted

Is Bash an interpreted language?

独自空忆成欢 提交于 2019-12-03 10:53:28
From what I've read so far, bash seems to fit the defintion of an interpreted language: it is not compiled into a lower format every statement ends up calling a subroutine / set of subroutines already translated into machine code (i.e. echo foo calls a precompiled executable) the interpreter itself, bash , has already been compiled However, I could not find a reference to bash on Wikipedia's page for interpreted languages , or by extensive searches on Google. I've also found a page on Programmers Stack Exchange that seems to imply that bash is not an interpreted language- if it's not, then

Why HTML/JavaScript/CSS are not compiled languages and will they ever be?

故事扮演 提交于 2019-12-03 04:32:37
问题 Why HTML/JavaScript/CSS are not becoming compiled languages (or maybe even merge into a single compiled language)? What if browsers were running "Browser Virtual Machine" and html/javascript/css sources could by compiled to a "browser bytecode". Wouldn't it help developers and users a lot? I can see a few challenges: What to do with zillions of existing pages? Make this compilation optional, so if you want you can use plain old html. If you want to feed a browser with a compiled page just use

How does an interpreter interpret the code?

大城市里の小女人 提交于 2019-12-03 03:43:38
问题 For simplicity imagine this scenario, we have a 2-bit computer, which has a pair of 2 bit registers called r1 and r2 and only works with immediate addressing. Lets say the bit sequence 00 means add to our cpu. Also 01 means move data to r1 and 10 means move data to r2. So there is an Assembly Language for this computer and a Assembler, where a sample code would be written like mov r1,1 mov r2,2 add r1,r2 Simply, when I assemble this code to native language and the file will be something like:

Why HTML/JavaScript/CSS are not compiled languages and will they ever be?

社会主义新天地 提交于 2019-12-02 17:02:08
Why HTML/JavaScript/CSS are not becoming compiled languages (or maybe even merge into a single compiled language)? What if browsers were running "Browser Virtual Machine" and html/javascript/css sources could by compiled to a "browser bytecode". Wouldn't it help developers and users a lot? I can see a few challenges: What to do with zillions of existing pages? Make this compilation optional, so if you want you can use plain old html. If you want to feed a browser with a compiled page just use .chtml for example. How search providers would index pages? Make a decompiler that would decompile

run interpret c++? [duplicate]

浪尽此生 提交于 2019-11-30 12:53:00
问题 This question already has answers here : Have you used any of the C++ interpreters (not compilers)? [closed] (8 answers) Closed 4 years ago . Is there a way i can run c++ code as interpreted instead of compiled? so i can edit code and write functions on the fly? Related: Have you used any of the C++ interpreters (not compilers)? 回答1: Take a look at Ch, an embeddable C++ interpreter. Ch is an embeddable C/C++ interpreter for cross-platform scripting, shell programming, 2D/3D plotting,

Does it make sense to use Hungarian notation prefixes in interpreted languages? [closed]

Deadly 提交于 2019-11-30 07:07:11
First of all, I have taken a look at the following posts to avoid duplicate question. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1184717/hungarian-notation Why shouldn't I use "Hungarian Notation"? Are variable prefixes (“Hungarian notation”) really necessary anymore? Do people use the Hungarian Naming Conventions in the real world? Now, all of these posts are related to C#, C++, Java - strongly typed languages. I do understand that there is no need for the prefixes when the type is known before compilation. Nevertheless, my question is: Is it worthwhile to use the prefixes in interpreter based

run interpret c++? [duplicate]

China☆狼群 提交于 2019-11-30 03:24:36
This question already has an answer here: Have you used any of the C++ interpreters (not compilers)? [closed] 8 answers Is there a way i can run c++ code as interpreted instead of compiled? so i can edit code and write functions on the fly? Related: Have you used any of the C++ interpreters (not compilers)? Take a look at Ch , an embeddable C++ interpreter. Ch is an embeddable C/C++ interpreter for cross-platform scripting, shell programming, 2D/3D plotting, numerical computing, and embedded scripting. Ch is a free and user-friendly alternative to C/C++ compilers for beginners to learn C/C++.