http-status-code-302

I am using a WebRequest to read an HTML site. The server seems to be redirecting my request. My Code is similar to the following: String URI = "http://www.foo.com/bar/index.html" WebRequest req = WebRequest.Create(URI); WebResponse resp = req.GetResponse(); StreamReader sr = new StreamReader(resp.GetResponseStream()); String returnedContent = sr.ReadToEnd(); When I check the content of the returnedContent it contains the content from a redirection like "http://www.foo.com/FOO_BAR/index.html". I am sure my requested URL exists since it is part of the recieved response (as an IFrame). Is there a

I'm trying to send a post request in Flutter with DIO package. Here is the request: getSessionId() async { var csrf = await getCsrftoken(); var dio = new Dio(new Options( baseUrl: "http://xxxxxxx/accounts/login/", connectTimeout: 5000, receiveTimeout: 100000, // 5s headers: { 'Cookie': "csrftoken=" + csrf }, contentType: ContentType.JSON, // Transform the response data to a String encoded with UTF8. // The default value is [ResponseType.JSON]. responseType: ResponseType.PLAIN )); var response; response = await dio.post("http://xxxxxxx/accounts/login/", data: { "username": "xxxxx", "password":

I have problem with the way Safari handles CORS requests. Consider following scenario: DomainA hosts a page which makes a XHR request to DomainB (origin header is set to DomainA) DomainB returns 302 redirect do DomainC (origin header is set to null, which seems to be OK with RFC) DomainC return 200 response with actual content This works in Chrome, FF, but it fails on Safari (tested on Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_5) AppleWebKit/600.8.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/8.0.8 Safari/600.8.9). When I make the request without xhr.withCredentials turned on, first, Safari makes a OPTIONS

I'm trying to use spring rest template to do a post request to login in. RestTemplate restTemplate = new RestTemplate(); HttpHeaders headers = new HttpHeaders(); headers.setContentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED); LinkedMultiValueMap<String, Object> mvm = new LinkedMultiValueMap<String, Object>(); mvm.add("LoginForm_Login", "login"); mvm.add("LoginForm_Password", "password"); ResponseEntity<String> result = restTemplate.exchange(uriDWLogin, HttpMethod.POST, requestEntity, String.class); My ResponseEntity status is 302, i want to follow this request to get the body response , because

I want to redirect users, after HTTPS login, to the HTTP pages on the site. Using HTTPS for the whole site is not going to happen. What I have so far is the following: User posts the login form to the secure site The secure server validates the credentials The secure server sends a 302 redirect to the client This works, except on my machine in IE6 the user gets an error message because the default is to warn when exiting a secure page. These errors are a usability killer for me and thus a showstopper. I changed it so that step 3 is Server sends html code with a meta refresh But this is very

A common scenario for a web app is to redirect after a POST that modifies the database. Like redirecting to the newly created database object after the user creates it. It seems like most web apps use 302 redirects, but 303 seems to be the correct thing to do according to the specification if you want the url specified in the redirect to be fetched with GET. Technically, with a 302, the browser is supposed to fetch the specified url with the same method that the original url was fetched with, which would be POST. Most browsers don't do that though. 302 - http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616

We have a couple of backends sitting behind our nginx front ends. Is it possible to intercept 301 / 302 redirects sent by these backends and have nginx handle them? We were thinging something alone the lines of: error_page 302 = @target; But I doubt 301/302 redirects can be handled the same as 404's etc etc... I mean, error_page probably doesnt apply to 200, etc error codes? So to summarize: Our backends send back 301/302s once in a while. We would like to have nginx intercept these, and rewrite them to another location block, where we could do any number of other things with them. Possible?