hl7

The company I work for recently started a project delving into the world of HL7 messaging and data trading. We are using BizTalk Server 2010 with the BTAHL7 accelerator for 2010 with success so far for HL7 v2 but now we have a need to accept HL7 v3 (CDA R2) documents. These are CCD's we will be accepting from an external vendor. I have the full suite of .xsd schemas from HL7 for CDA R2 (all 1541 of them) but am struggling with how to figure out which schemas relate to the messages we will be receiving. All I have to work with are test CCD messages from our trading partner and no other

I am in the process of implementing an HL7 Module in our EMR, but I am confused as how to test the messages. I was looking at LabCorp and Surescripts and was unable to find a testing Api or a module, it seems like I will have to deal with bit of bureaucracy to get any help from them. Is there an easy way to test my HL7 module? Labcorp is a pretty hideous offender when it comes to HL7. We've always said at my company that if there were such a thing as an "HL7 Police" then Labcorp would be their first stop. FYI, Quest is almost as bad. I've done many interfaces with Labcorp and here are a few

I am working on CDA as well as CCD of HL7 version 3. Can someone tell me what is the purpose of CDA and CCD and why it is used? I tried a lot to figure out but i can't, please help me. (if i get all the information through HL7 version 2 why should i use HL7 version 3?) RE: CDA vs. CCD Source: HITSP_09_N_451.pdf Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) - CDA is an HL7 document markup standard that specifies the structure and semantics of "clinical documents" for the purpose of exchange. CDA documents derive their machine processable meaning from the HL7 Reference Information Model (RIM) and use the

I get this error when trying to parsing a HL7 message. I dont know why and how to fix it. I'm using hapi v2.2 . SO please help me. Thanks in advance!. Here is catlog!!! 08-28 15:03:28.552: E/dalvikvm(642): Could not find class 'ca.uhn.hl7v2.DefaultHapiContext', referenced from method com.example.hl7demo.MainActivity.onCreate 08-28 15:03:28.673: E/AndroidRuntime(642): java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: ca.uhn.hl7v2.DefaultHapiContext 08-28 15:03:28.673: E/AndroidRuntime(642): at com.example.hl7demo.MainActivity.onCreate(MainActivity.java:38) bases on this tutorial http://hl7api.sourceforge.net

I'm working with Mirth Connect v2.0 and getting stuck on one task, transformation of XML to HL7 v3. I've connected to an Ms-Access Database (the hospital system is in Access), I've set up the channel and set the Connector Type to File Writer in the destination tab. When I deploy the channel I can see the log file is populated with the records in XML format, now I'm stuck on how to convert/transform the XML message to HL7. Any pointers out there? In the channel Summary tab Click "Set Data Types" and make sure the Source inbound is set to XML and the Source outbound is set to HL7 v3 and the

Searching for a library or framework that would provide an object model, parsing, validating, etc The idea would be to be able to spin up a new object of type hl7 v2 or v3. Then perhaps call it message type ORU_R01 or ADT, or ORM. Wouldn't life be great if we were able to do something like this: HL7V2 myMessage = new HL7V2(); myMessage.Type = V2MsgTypes.ORU_R01; myMessage.TryParse(someHL7_string); if (myMessage.IsValid) { //do some work //maybe access the PID segment if (myMessage.Patient.Names.FamilyName =="Johnson") { //do more work } } You want nHAPI I used it on a project previously, and

I'm developing a Health Care System, and I'm new with HL7. My Question is how can I make my system HL7 (Health level 7) certified? What are the main steps I should follow? Thanks, You can become member of http://www.hl7.org community and ask there. As far as I know and what http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HL7 says about certifications there is no such thing as 1 worldwide HL7 certification authority right now (although hl7.org offers some kind of conformance testing ). There are many conformance levels and many integration profiles and many vendors and many legacy systems. What seems to make most