hashmap

Map vs List w.r.t searching Time complexity

坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2020-06-23 08:25:31
问题 You might have come across someplace where it is mentioned that it is faster to find elements in hashmap/dictionary/table than list/array. My question is WHY? (inference so far I made: Why should it be faster, as far I see, in both data structure, it has to travel throughout till it reaches the required element) 回答1: Let’s reason by analogy. Suppose you want to find a specific shirt to put on in the morning. I assume that, in doing so, you don’t have to look at literally every item of

Map vs List w.r.t searching Time complexity

冷暖自知 提交于 2020-06-23 08:22:48
问题 You might have come across someplace where it is mentioned that it is faster to find elements in hashmap/dictionary/table than list/array. My question is WHY? (inference so far I made: Why should it be faster, as far I see, in both data structure, it has to travel throughout till it reaches the required element) 回答1: Let’s reason by analogy. Suppose you want to find a specific shirt to put on in the morning. I assume that, in doing so, you don’t have to look at literally every item of

Getting last row's data in the map

本小妞迷上赌 提交于 2020-06-17 12:57:34
问题 My objective is to create a map. It have reqid , name and lowest status number of a set as a key. Here set refers to rows belonging to a specific Reqid . The value of the map is an Arraylist which consists of all rows as objects of a specific id . public class MapKey { private Integer id; private String name; private Integer status; public MapKey(Integer id, String name,Integer status) { this.id = id; this.name = name; this.status=status; } @Override toString,hashCode,equals public class

Getting last row's data in the map

人走茶凉 提交于 2020-06-17 12:57:31
问题 My objective is to create a map. It have reqid , name and lowest status number of a set as a key. Here set refers to rows belonging to a specific Reqid . The value of the map is an Arraylist which consists of all rows as objects of a specific id . public class MapKey { private Integer id; private String name; private Integer status; public MapKey(Integer id, String name,Integer status) { this.id = id; this.name = name; this.status=status; } @Override toString,hashCode,equals public class

Junit Mockito for global java.util.Map

为君一笑 提交于 2020-06-17 09:40:29
问题 I am trying to Test a method but it has a global variable which is null, Please guide me so I can assign value to global variable i.e. a Map My Junit: public class ErrorTest { @Mock private DataSource db; @Mock private JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate; @InjectMocks private RateServiceImpl rateService = new RateServiceImpl(); @Mock private RaterDao raterDao; @Resource private MessageSource msg ; @Mock Map<String, StringAttribute> errorMap = new HashMap<String, StringAttribute>(); @Before public void

A hashmap alternative to the “if then else” statement in Java

眉间皱痕 提交于 2020-06-01 07:38:07
问题 Can anyone assist me with an alternative to if then else statements for control flow? Or advise on a good article? From what I've seen, some use mapping or enums. Trouble I'm having is that I have multiple conditions i.e. if (condition1 && condition2 && condition3)... and I need to do this for several permutations and all 3 variables need to be validated. Please can someone point me in the right direction? else if (String.Utils.isNotEmpty(payload.getKeyChange2TokenNumber()) && String.Utils

Alternative for an if then else statement

假如想象 提交于 2020-06-01 07:38:06
问题 Can anyone assist me with an alternative to if-then-else statements for control flow? Or advise on a good article? From what I've seen, some use mapping or enums. Trouble I'm having is that I have multiple conditions i.e. if (condition1 && condition2 && condition3)... and I need to do this for several permutations and all 3 variables need to be validated. Please can someone point me in the right direction? else if (String.Utils.isNotEmpty(payload.getKeyChange2TokenNumber()) && String.Utils

Unordered_Map Lookup Time

早过忘川 提交于 2020-05-25 05:11:12
问题 The built in maps and sets in C++ libraries (including unordered_map and multimap) requires that the find function (used to lookup a specific element) utilize an iterator for traversing the elements. The C++ reference site claims that looking up elements using these data structures takes on average constant time, much like a regular hash table. But wouldn't an iterator have to traverse the entire list, making this O(n) time on average, before finding the element? 回答1: You statement are no

Using ArrayList or HashMap for better speed

ぐ巨炮叔叔 提交于 2020-05-24 21:21:04
问题 I need a 'List' or 'Map',... of object A. This list will be added from another ArrayList. Object A is considered to be equal to another when id parameter of A equals. My problem is I only want add an object that does not exist in my List. I wonder between the two alternatives for implementation. Using ArrayList or HashMap 1. ArrayList: for (A a: source) {if (! (a in ArrayList)) addToArrayList();} 2. HashMap <id, A> for (A a: source) {hasmap.put (a.id, a)} Which will give better speed to add a

How do I search a hash table?

落爺英雄遲暮 提交于 2020-05-24 03:47:39
问题 I've just started learning about hash tables and I understand how to insert but not how to search. These are the algorithms I'll be basing this question off: Hashing the key int Hash (int key) { return key % 10; //table has a max size of 10 } Linear probing for collision resolution. Suppose I call insert twice with the keys 1, 11, and 21. This would return slot 1 for all 3 keys. After collision resolution the table would have the values 1, 11, and 21 at slots 1, 2, and 3. This is what I