hardware-infrastructure

Had only one public subnet to VPC, and added NAT gateway to that public subnet instance, but i'm not able access the instance using NAT ip address

大兔子大兔子 提交于 2019-12-13 09:24:11
问题 I had only one public subnet to VPC,and added NAT gateway to that public subnet, but i'm not able access the instance using NAT ip address. @1)I'm able to ping the instance, with public Ip address(added icmp to security group), but by using NAT elastic IP address i'm not able to ping. @2)Does NAT is applicable for single public subnet or not. My goal is to translate the ip address attached to public subnet instance. 回答1: I believe you are using the wrong service for what you are trying to do.

Why is it not advisable to have the database and web server on the same machine?

☆樱花仙子☆ 提交于 2019-11-28 02:37:10
Listening to Scott Hanselman's interview with the Stack Overflow team ( part 1 and 2 ), he was adamant that the SQL server and application server should be on separate machines. Is this just to make sure that if one server is compromised, both systems aren't accessible? Do the security concerns outweigh the complexity of two servers (extra cost, dedicated network connection between the two, more maintenance, etc.), especially for a small application, where neither piece is using too much CPU or memory? Even with two servers, with one server compromised, an attacker could still do serious

Why is it not advisable to have the database and web server on the same machine?

元气小坏坏 提交于 2019-11-27 04:56:10
问题 Listening to Scott Hanselman's interview with the Stack Overflow team (part 1 and 2), he was adamant that the SQL server and application server should be on separate machines. Is this just to make sure that if one server is compromised, both systems aren't accessible? Do the security concerns outweigh the complexity of two servers (extra cost, dedicated network connection between the two, more maintenance, etc.), especially for a small application, where neither piece is using too much CPU or