git-merge

问题 Suppose I have two branches, A and B . Do the following properties hold? Merging A into B conflicts if and only if merging B into A conflicts. The contents of my files after merging A into B is the same as the contents of my files after merging B into A . 回答1: cmaster's answer is correct, with caveats. Let's start by noting these items / assumptions: There is always a single merge base commit. Let's call this commit B , for base. The other two inputs are also single commits. Let's call them L

问题 Suppose I have two branches, A and B . Do the following properties hold? Merging A into B conflicts if and only if merging B into A conflicts. The contents of my files after merging A into B is the same as the contents of my files after merging B into A . 回答1: cmaster's answer is correct, with caveats. Let's start by noting these items / assumptions: There is always a single merge base commit. Let's call this commit B , for base. The other two inputs are also single commits. Let's call them L

问题 When I am trying to pull my git repository with "git pull", it keeps telling me that I have local changes although I have not touched any of the mentioned files. Can someone explain this behavior and knows a solution? git status: # On branch master # Your branch is behind 'origin/master' by 1 commit, and can be fast-forwarded. # (use "git pull" to update your local branch) # # Changes not staged for commit: # (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) # (use "git checkout --

问题 When I am trying to pull my git repository with "git pull", it keeps telling me that I have local changes although I have not touched any of the mentioned files. Can someone explain this behavior and knows a solution? git status: # On branch master # Your branch is behind 'origin/master' by 1 commit, and can be fast-forwarded. # (use "git pull" to update your local branch) # # Changes not staged for commit: # (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) # (use "git checkout --

问题 Using CI/CD approach, one of the principle mentioned, here: Automate wherever possible Merging can be done two ways, based on the scenario: 1) Fast-forward merge 2) 3-way merge Does it make sense to think about automating merge conflicts? 回答1: No. A merge conflict is literally the end result of a failure to automate. Remember: Git is doing its best to ensure that it doesn't lose any data, and a merge conflict is Git telling you in its standard, paranoid fashion that it could lose data and it

问题 I want to merge two branches but before, I'd like to review the changes between the two branches on all files whose filename ends with .twig . Is it possible, or should I use some bash-magic like git diff --name-only branch1..branch2 | grep .twig ? 回答1: You can pass the file names to git diff after a --, so: git diff --name-only branch1..branch2 -- '*.twig' Should do what you want. I put *.twig in single quotes so the shell won't expand it. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17215172

问题 I have just merged two branches 'branch1' and 'branch2'. The problem is that it is now a mess with a lot of conflicts, with sometimes duplicate contents (is it possible ??). What I want to do is to force for some files from 'branch1' to be merged against 'branch2' and conversely to force some files from 'branch2' to be merged against 'branch1', knowing I am now on 'branch1'. Is it possible ? Update : there seems to be problem with git-merge ? Suppose I keep the branch1 version, then echo

问题 I have just merged two branches 'branch1' and 'branch2'. The problem is that it is now a mess with a lot of conflicts, with sometimes duplicate contents (is it possible ??). What I want to do is to force for some files from 'branch1' to be merged against 'branch2' and conversely to force some files from 'branch2' to be merged against 'branch1', knowing I am now on 'branch1'. Is it possible ? Update : there seems to be problem with git-merge ? Suppose I keep the branch1 version, then echo

问题 I have the following directory structure: project/ .git/ ... app/ ... config/ initializers/ braintree.rb environments/ production.rb .gitattributes My project uses two main branches, master and staging, each tracking a different remote (production and staging heroku apps). The idea is that the staging branch moves forward with new features, they get pushed to and tested on the staging remote, then master is fast-forwarded to match staging and pushed to the production remote. Here's what I

问题 I have a nice reproduction script for a scenario in which GIT gives me an unexpected result: # in an empty directory git init echo 4 > a.txt git add a.txt git commit -m "initial commit" git checkout -b test echo 6 > a.txt git commit -am "4 => 6" git checkout -b release master git merge --no-edit --no-ff test git checkout master echo 6 > a.txt git commit -am "4 => 6" echo 4 > a.txt git commit -am "6 => 4" git checkout release git merge --no-edit master Before the last merge a.txt contains 6