git-merge

问题 I frequently come across the following Merge Conflict issue and resolving it but I would like to ask if my solution is correct. Personally, I do not see any issues given that the functional tests are passing but it would be nice to have an insight on this one. So, let's say we have got two branches: develop feature I am changing the code in feature branch and then creating a PR to merge into develop . However, Github 's or Bitbucket 's diff tool suggests that we have got a Merge Conflict;

问题 This question already has answers here : Closed 8 years ago . Possible Duplicate: What's the best CRLF handling strategy with git? I'm currently working on a project where almost every time I merge master into my branch, I get merge conflicts where git says the entire file has changed. Often when I compare these files using Notepad++'s compare tool, it reports that only a couple of lines have actually changed and often it shouldn't even result in a conflict. For a while I've simply put up

问题 I commited a new feature locally, pulled from remote and got merge conflicts. After resolving them, my feature stopped working. I assumed that I made an error and asked a question about this yesterday. So I did a hard reset to my previous commit, repeated the merge and resolved the conflicts I was shown. But again, my feature stopped working. I looked through the code manually and saw that part of the code of my local commit was changed by the pull but no merge conflict had been displayed for

问题 Is there a way in git to merge two branches without merging file? In other words just to draw the merge arrow. Let say I have branches A and B. I need to merge branch B to A, but no need all the changes in B, but rather only need to link to branches together. git checkout A git merge B --no need changes In general is there a way to merge two branches without submodules. I want to keep submodules as it is in Branch A and still need to merge branch B. Update git merge -s ours BRANCH_NAME worked

问题 I commited a new feature locally, pulled from remote and got merge conflicts. After resolving them, my feature stopped working (seems like I made an error). My idea was to go back to my commit and somehow repeat the merge. I checked out my commit, made a new branch, checked out master and tried to merge the new branch into master. This didn't work because "Everything is up to date". How do I best handle this if I don't want to fix the error by looking through the code by hand? /edit : I

问题 I commited a new feature locally, pulled from remote and got merge conflicts. After resolving them, my feature stopped working (seems like I made an error). My idea was to go back to my commit and somehow repeat the merge. I checked out my commit, made a new branch, checked out master and tried to merge the new branch into master. This didn't work because "Everything is up to date". How do I best handle this if I don't want to fix the error by looking through the code by hand? /edit : I

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63862271/github-still-shows-differences-between-branches-after-sucessfull-merge

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63862271/github-still-shows-differences-between-branches-after-sucessfull-merge

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64083632/why-does-merging-from-a-particular-github-repository-into-a-local-git-repository

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64083632/why-does-merging-from-a-particular-github-repository-into-a-local-git-repository