git-lfs

问题 I started tracking some files with git-lfs. Upon my next git push , I get constant (censored) message: Locking support detected on remote "origin". Consider enabling it with: $ git config lfs.<repo_url>.git/info/lfs.locksverify true When I run git config lfs.<repo_url>.git/info/lfs.locksverify true , the command exits with success and no output, and the same message continues to print with every git push . Considering we have automation scripted around git output, how can I disable this

问题 I started tracking some files with git-lfs. Upon my next git push , I get constant (censored) message: Locking support detected on remote "origin". Consider enabling it with: $ git config lfs.<repo_url>.git/info/lfs.locksverify true When I run git config lfs.<repo_url>.git/info/lfs.locksverify true , the command exits with success and no output, and the same message continues to print with every git push . Considering we have automation scripted around git output, how can I disable this

问题 I have a git repo where many files should be lfs because they are larger than 100M. Looking around I was unable to find a step by step guide that explain how to migrate a real existing repo with many branches and where lfs files are within subdirectories. In my case large files are spread around the repo like this: code/track1/file000.pkl code/track3/dat000.bin code/track4/pip000.pkl code/subcode/track5/pip000.pkl code/subcode/track5/pop000.model I suppose to convert the git project into git

问题 Github has a limit on push large file. So if you want to push a large file to your repo, you have to use Git LFS. I know it's a bad idea to add binary file in git repo. But if I am using gitlab on my server and there is no limit of file size in a repo, and I don't care the repo size to be super large on my server. In this condition, what's the advantage of git lfs? git clone or git checkout will be faster? 回答1: One specificity of Git (and other distributed systems) compared to centralized

问题 I want to use LFS for an existing Git repository and track *.foo files, converting the files in history too. I guess I can do this: git lfs track "*.foo" # changed `.gitattributes` and all `.foo` files commit -a -m "Started tracking foo files." git lfs migrate import --everything --include="*.foo" Should I track the files before importing the repository, as I do above, or should I do that afterwards? Does it matter? 回答1: In trying it both ways, it appears that importing a repository will turn

问题 I thought that git lfs migrate rewrote the history of a repo so that specified large files were kept in LFS. This means that the repo should get smaller, because it doesn't directly contain all versions of large files. However, when I run git lfs migrate import --include="test-data/**" --include-ref=refs/heads/master All of the files in the test-data/ directory are replaced with files that look like this: version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 oid sha256

问题 "New" Git Comment: Just today I ran across the following comment from Git for the first time (at least the first time I saw it): Mikes-Mac$ git push Locking support detected on remote "origin". Consider enabling it with: $ git config 'lfs.https://github.com/<my_repo>.git/info/lfs.locksverify' true Everything up-to-date Mikes-Mac$ What is this Locking support ? Is this some sort of mutex locking for the LFS (large file storage)? If so, isn't it absolutely essential to get anything on git to

问题 Github does not allow to push files larger than 100 MB. Using git lfs , it is possible, to push large files to Github. I am just curious about the idea of the process: To me it seems, that git lfs is just an additional switch which enables the push of large files (via https:/ only) to Github. But I can't image, that's all? The doumentation in altlassian states Git LFS (Large File Storage) is a Git extension developed by Atlassian, GitHub, and a few other open source contributors, that reduces

问题 I have an issue with git LFS use in Jenkins. What I am doing now is that I am building a war from maven through Jenkins that war contains a jar file through Git LFS we have converted that jar file into a pointer file. But during checkout from Jenkins that jar is not converting into its original size rather it is included in the war as a pointer. We have used git plugin and git-client plugin with version 3.3.0 and 2.4.2 respectively in Jenkins. What is happening: A.war -> a.jar(whose original

问题 I have an issue with git LFS use in Jenkins. What I am doing now is that I am building a war from maven through Jenkins that war contains a jar file through Git LFS we have converted that jar file into a pointer file. But during checkout from Jenkins that jar is not converting into its original size rather it is included in the war as a pointer. We have used git plugin and git-client plugin with version 3.3.0 and 2.4.2 respectively in Jenkins. What is happening: A.war -> a.jar(whose original