generics

return different generics that implement same interface

雨燕双飞 提交于 2021-02-10 09:34:59
问题 Considering there is a method static IEnumerable<IComparable> q() { return new List<string>(); } I am trying to achieve the same but on my own classes and as a result i receive casting error cs0266 I tried to cast this way return (Common<Message>)new A(); but it results InvalidCastException interface Common<T> where T : Message { T Source { get; } void Show(); } interface Message { string Message { get; } } class AMsg : Message { public string Message => "A"; } class A : Common<AMsg> { public

return different generics that implement same interface

只愿长相守 提交于 2021-02-10 09:33:53
问题 Considering there is a method static IEnumerable<IComparable> q() { return new List<string>(); } I am trying to achieve the same but on my own classes and as a result i receive casting error cs0266 I tried to cast this way return (Common<Message>)new A(); but it results InvalidCastException interface Common<T> where T : Message { T Source { get; } void Show(); } interface Message { string Message { get; } } class AMsg : Message { public string Message => "A"; } class A : Common<AMsg> { public

This construct causes code to be less generic than indicated by the type annotations

旧城冷巷雨未停 提交于 2021-02-10 09:13:34
问题 So I'm getting the "This construct causes code to be less generic than indicated by the type annotations. The type variable 'a has been constrained to be type 'CountType'." warning, and the constraint is causing a problem in other bits of the code. I've tried making the type explicitly generic, but it's not working. I've put this code on tryfsharp to make it easier to play with. Apologies for the mound of code, I tried cutting it down and simplifying some types. module Stuff type CountType =

This construct causes code to be less generic than indicated by the type annotations

馋奶兔 提交于 2021-02-10 09:08:29
问题 So I'm getting the "This construct causes code to be less generic than indicated by the type annotations. The type variable 'a has been constrained to be type 'CountType'." warning, and the constraint is causing a problem in other bits of the code. I've tried making the type explicitly generic, but it's not working. I've put this code on tryfsharp to make it easier to play with. Apologies for the mound of code, I tried cutting it down and simplifying some types. module Stuff type CountType =

This construct causes code to be less generic than indicated by the type annotations

我与影子孤独终老i 提交于 2021-02-10 09:07:57
问题 So I'm getting the "This construct causes code to be less generic than indicated by the type annotations. The type variable 'a has been constrained to be type 'CountType'." warning, and the constraint is causing a problem in other bits of the code. I've tried making the type explicitly generic, but it's not working. I've put this code on tryfsharp to make it easier to play with. Apologies for the mound of code, I tried cutting it down and simplifying some types. module Stuff type CountType =

Generic Lower bounded Method

假如想象 提交于 2021-02-10 08:03:53
问题 Let's say I have the following classes Animal , Fish , and CatFish . CatFish extends Fish and Fish extends Animal . There is a generic class called MyPets , which has a type parameter (generic) called T , and that will be parameterized with the above classes' objects. My question is, how do I create a lower bounded method in D that will take any objects that is a PARENT class of the CatFish class. 回答1: You can't. TL;DR: Type parameters can have several bounds, like in class Box {...} . But a

Generic Lower bounded Method

不羁岁月 提交于 2021-02-10 08:03:23
问题 Let's say I have the following classes Animal , Fish , and CatFish . CatFish extends Fish and Fish extends Animal . There is a generic class called MyPets , which has a type parameter (generic) called T , and that will be parameterized with the above classes' objects. My question is, how do I create a lower bounded method in D that will take any objects that is a PARENT class of the CatFish class. 回答1: You can't. TL;DR: Type parameters can have several bounds, like in class Box {...} . But a

Variable of array which holds objects conform to protocol with associated type

非 Y 不嫁゛ 提交于 2021-02-10 07:37:06
问题 I am trying to build my own Form builder. It was going well until the point when I wanted to get a Value from a Cell . I wanted to make it generic as possible, for instance some Cell s could be responsible of ValueType of Int and others could be String . Anyways, my all Cell s basically conforms to protocol called BaseCell . I assigned a associatedType to this protocol and added a variable value which would return different types for each Cell . After some tryings I come with with the

Generics at Runtime [duplicate]

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2021-02-10 07:02:04
问题 This question already has answers here : Java generics type erasure: when and what happens? (7 answers) Closed 4 years ago . There two programs Why is the first code code working?I expected it to throw a Run time Exception while accessing the elements as String is added instead of Integer Similarly.. The second code is throwing Run time Exception while accessing the element though it is able to add Integer in the arrayList comfortably despite declaring it to hold String. In both the codes,We

Generics at Runtime [duplicate]

旧城冷巷雨未停 提交于 2021-02-10 07:01:55
问题 This question already has answers here : Java generics type erasure: when and what happens? (7 answers) Closed 4 years ago . There two programs Why is the first code code working?I expected it to throw a Run time Exception while accessing the elements as String is added instead of Integer Similarly.. The second code is throwing Run time Exception while accessing the element though it is able to add Integer in the arrayList comfortably despite declaring it to hold String. In both the codes,We