fast-forward

问题 * 9dbd857 (hotfix-correct-java-jdk-path, feature/add-ansible-galaxy-requirements-file) requirements.yml: adds maven and nodejs requirements * 1643619 (QOL-1640-enable-vpc-peering) roles/ansible-linux-commons: change value of hostname in cloud-init * b5fd2a4 roles/bamboo-agent: add bitbucket ssh host key to /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts * d5cc1f7 vpc cfn template: produce outputs conditionally * 3b87efe vpc cfn template: use csv for subnet/AZ mapping * 2e93096 roles/bamboo-agent: Install chrome on

问题 * 9dbd857 (hotfix-correct-java-jdk-path, feature/add-ansible-galaxy-requirements-file) requirements.yml: adds maven and nodejs requirements * 1643619 (QOL-1640-enable-vpc-peering) roles/ansible-linux-commons: change value of hostname in cloud-init * b5fd2a4 roles/bamboo-agent: add bitbucket ssh host key to /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts * d5cc1f7 vpc cfn template: produce outputs conditionally * 3b87efe vpc cfn template: use csv for subnet/AZ mapping * 2e93096 roles/bamboo-agent: Install chrome on

问题 I had a curious git behaviour today, and I want to ask if this is normal. Now, this is the situation (new commits are added to the bottom): br1 br2 A \ B C D Now, when I make git checkout br1 git merge --no-ff br2 It becomes like this (please read up to down; newest commit is 'E') br1 br2 A | \ | B | C | D | / E OK.. Now, weird thing is; now I call "git status"; it says I'm 4 commits ahead of the remote branch. How is this happening? Shouldn't I be only one commit ahead? And the peculiar

问题 how can i disable fast-forward for mergining branches in aptana 3 ? example: create/checkout a branch (foo) commit changes checkout master-branch merge with foo 回答1: Set it in project repository configuration git config --add merge.ff false 回答2: I think the nearest you get is to use merge --no-ff . 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9159895/aptana-git-merge-without-fast-forward

问题 I have a git remote "mine" (happens to be a github fork) that has managed to get ahead by 2 commits. My local master branch is ahead of it by 244 commits (pulled from the original gitub repo). As a result, pushing to "mine" is not fast-forward. How can I list the 2 commits by which "mine" is ahead? 回答1: Your question is a little unclear, but it sounds like you want to list the commits on the remote branch that don't exist in your local branch yet. This is simply accomplished using a commit

问题 I like to keep my feature branches up to date with develop. Is there anything wrong with frequently doing "git merge --no-ff develop". And then at the end, running "git flow feature finish feature1". These feature branches are shared (which means it is possible that someone else could be working on it, or that I'm developing out of it at my computer at home), mostly because I like knowing that they are backed up somewhere else. If they weren't shared, would consistently rebasing be preferred?

问题 I am using the git flow way of managing branches in my repo, as described in: http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ Thus the sequence of commands I should use would be as follows: git checkout mybranch git pull --rebase origin develop git checkout develop git merge --no-ff mybranch However, there is one thing that I would like to do differently, in some cases: I would like to preserve all of my commits on my feature branch ( mybranch ), but have them lumped together (or

问题 I would like to protect my git repository so only non master branches can be overwritten. Is there a way to protect only selected branches? 回答1: You can use GitEnterprise to setup per-branch permissions (admin) to block non-fastforward pushes using fine-grained access permission. And git config --system receive.denyNonFastForwards true will simply do the job if you need to block history changing for all branches. 回答2: Here's an update hook (copy to hooks/update) that I wrote for my own use.

问题 I am creating a SQL 2008 R2 stored procedure to duplicate a row and all it's children. It's a 3-tiered setup with a Parent, Child and Sub-Child Given the ID of the parent I need to create a duplicate. I have solved it using a fast_forward cursor . I know I can also do it with a while loop through rows but I do not believe that will be faster than this cursor method. What are your thoughts? Is there a better way to accomplish this task without using cursors? EDIT: Another option I considered

问题 Since some people recommend no fast-fordward (--no-ff) on merges in Git, I wanted to do that. But I can't see where to check to enable that in the TortoiseGit GUI. Yes, I could do this from the command line. But others in the group won't use it, so I need a GUI solution. EDIT: removed push from question; it is not realistic as pointed out below. The references were to pulls only. 回答1: Where do you search for it? When selecting TortoiseGit -> Merge menu item I get dialog shown below. I can't