embedding

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38489776/idiomatic-way-to-embed-struct-with-custom-marshaljson-method

问题 I want to have an embedded chromeless youtube video preload its video WITHOUT playing when the page loads. Right now I'm using an awkward "play then quickly pause" script which causes small problems (half-second audio leaks and fails quite a bit). For this seemingly simple functionality, is there a better/more elegant way to preload? 回答1: I had the same question and came across this question. After some research, I think I found a cleaner, albeit similar, answer. When the JavaScript API calls

问题 I want to have an embedded chromeless youtube video preload its video WITHOUT playing when the page loads. Right now I'm using an awkward "play then quickly pause" script which causes small problems (half-second audio leaks and fails quite a bit). For this seemingly simple functionality, is there a better/more elegant way to preload? 回答1: I had the same question and came across this question. After some research, I think I found a cleaner, albeit similar, answer. When the JavaScript API calls

问题 I'm working on a project and if you scroll down to the "What is RoadAware" section you can see a YouTube video embed that looks awful! I need the video to fill the "about-left" div 100% to match the "about-right" div. I've been struggling to find an answer, any help is really appreciated! http://road-aware.herokuapp.com/ 回答1: Add embed-responsive embed-responsive-4by3 to your video-wrapper class This is from bootstrap <!-- 16:9 aspect ratio --> <div class="embed-responsive embed-responsive

问题 I hope my question can be made clear. I've done my best to make this concise, but please ask for clarification if it is necessary. In JavaScript, it's common practice to have a "plugin" modify an existing object by creating new methods. jQuery plugins do this, for example. I have the need to do something similar in Go, and am looking for the best way to do it. The simplest to implement would simply be to store functions in a map[string]func type of data structure, then call these new "methods

问题 It seems that the tf.nn.dynamic_rnn has been deprecated: Warning: THIS FUNCTION IS DEPRECATED. It will be removed in a future version. Instructions for updating: Please use keras.layers.RNN(cell), which is equivalent to this API I have checked out keras.layers.RNN(cell) and it says that it can use masking which I assume can act as a replacement for dynamic_rnn 's sequence_length parameter? This layer supports masking for input data with a variable number of timesteps. To introduce masks to

问题 I have some example code in which I declare a type foo with some methods which call each other (say: foo.get , which is called by foo.double and foo.toString ). I have another type, bar , which embeds foo and redefines get . I am forced to redefine double and toString on bar , so they can see bar.get (rather than only foo.get ), but the body of these functions is basically identical to the original. Is there a better way to organise this code, to avoid the redundancy while still having bar

问题 I just discovered that letter-spacing doesn't always work in webkit (and perhaps other browsers?) when embedding fonts. I've tried it on two different fonts and received different results. "League Gothic Regular" will work http://www.theleagueofmoveabletype.com/fonts/7-league-gothic "Quicksand Light" will not http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/Quicksand What's the skinny? Is there a way to force the hand of non-compliant fonts? Quick note: Firefox does seem to apply to both fonts. 回答1: I'm not

问题 I try to embed Python 3.3, as described here. I'm on MacOS 10.8 which has Python 2.7 so I downloaded binary distribution of version 3.3 from python.org. From it I got all the headers and "Python" which I renamed to "python33" so it wont collide with installed "Python" lib. I put everything into a folder: embed.c /include python33 "file python33" says: python33 (for architecture i386): Mach-O dynamically linked shared library i386 python33 (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit dynamically

问题 The situation I have now is the same as was asked about in this thread: Meaning of a struct with embedded anonymous interface? type A interface { Foo() string } type B struct { A bar string } Idiomatically, coming from a backround in OOP languages, what it looks like this pattern is "trying to say" to me is that B must implement interface A. But I get by now that "Go is different". So, rather than the compile-time check I expected at first, this is happy to compile with or without a func (B)