dozer

Dozer deep mapping Set<ComplexObject> to Set<String>

由 我只是一个虾纸丫 提交于 2019-12-10 08:21:19
问题 Disclaimer: the same question has already been asked here Mapping deep properties with intermediate collections in dozer, but it has no accepted answer (and no proper answer for my case). So the question. I have a realm composed by a ComplexObject like the following public class ComplexObject { private Set<AnotherComplexObject> inner; ... //other fields, setters and getters } public Class AnotherComplexObject { private String property; ... //other fields, setters and getters } Now, I am

dozer Boolean property mapping

由 谁都会走 提交于 2019-12-10 02:17:22
问题 It appears that Dozer will not map a Boolean property if the accessor of that property is defined as isProperty() rather than getProperty() . The following groovy script illustrates the problem: import org.dozer.* class ProductCommand { Boolean foo } public class ProductDto { private Boolean foo; public Boolean isFoo() { this.foo } public void setFoo(Boolean p0) { this.foo = p0 } } def mapper = new DozerBeanMapper() dto = new ProductDto(foo: true) assert dto.isFoo() ProductCommand mappedCmd =

SuperCSV, Dozer: Writing to a csv file. For Object with a list into multiple rows

由 守給你的承諾、 提交于 2019-12-08 11:22:12
问题 I have a class A which has few properties: class A { private String col1; private String col2; private List<B> bList; // setters and getters } Class B { private String b1; private String b2; //setters and getters } I am trying to write this into a csv file using supercsv and dozer. The csv should have the same number of rows as elements in the list bList from class A. And should have four columns col1, col2 (which would be common for all the rows) and b1, b2 from the list of class B in class

Java: Merge 2 “beans” to produce a new one

由 跟風遠走 提交于 2019-12-07 23:59:28
I need to take all the fields and collections from Bean1 and Bean2, sometimes apply some business logic, and produce Bean3 (all beans are hibernate/domain objects of the same type with a reasonably complex graph). Any thoughts on how to do this? Done something similar in the past? My ideas: Dozer (http://dozer.sourceforge.net/) BeanUtils (http://commons.apache.org/beanutils/) Handrolled solution A.N.Other cool solution? Any recommendations? Dozer is a nice bean mapping tool. However, it won't perform any business logic, of course. I should not be a problem to implement a business logic and to

Is it possible to configure Dozer such that by default fields are rather accessed directly that through setter-/getter method

由 坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2019-12-06 19:18:29
问题 I have to map a complex structure of Java classes which don't expose their fields through set-/get-methods in general (this is given and can't be changed). So mapping can only be performed on a direct field access. Dozer allows individual fields to be made accessible but I haven't found a setting to make this the general behaviour. As a result I wouldn't have to map each field explicitly just for making it accessible! Does this option exist? - On a class level? - On a global level? 回答1: You

Custom converter with Spring dependency injection

由 纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-06 08:08:24
问题 Is there a way to define a custom converter in Dozer for converting one top-level type to another, which is itself a Spring bean and thus can get its dependencies injected? The dozer docs propose to add the following XML definition: <converter type="org.dozer.converters.TestCustomConverter" > <class-a>org.dozer.vo.CustomDoubleObject</class-a> <class-b>java.lang.Double</class-b> </converter> Unfortunately, this causes Dozer to instantiate org.dozer.converters.TestCustomConverter directly,

Dozer mapping JodaTime property not working as expected

由 谁说我不能喝 提交于 2019-12-05 12:57:31
问题 I am using Dozer to map between a Document class to DocumentManagementBean class, both of my own making. Both have a property, with getters and setters, of Joda DateTime type, called dateAdded. When Document object d has property dateAdded =x, calling mapper.map(d, DocumentManagementBean.class) all fields get auto-mapped correctly (since I have full control over code base I am able to get away with no dozer-config and rely simply on matching property names), EXCEPT the dateAdded field, where

Dozer JAVA的POJO 映射工具

由 佐手、 提交于 2019-12-05 01:47:43
Dozer http://www.manongjc.com/article/50949.html JAVA的映射工具 BeanUtils dozer的使用方法 https://blog.csdn.net/qq_39004032/article/details/81106432 dozer使用教程 https://blog.csdn.net/drdongshiye/article/details/87027855 来源： https://www.cnblogs.com/kelelipeng/p/11895588.html

Is it possible to configure Dozer such that by default fields are rather accessed directly that through setter-/getter method

由 孤街浪徒 提交于 2019-12-05 00:57:34
I have to map a complex structure of Java classes which don't expose their fields through set-/get-methods in general (this is given and can't be changed). So mapping can only be performed on a direct field access. Dozer allows individual fields to be made accessible but I haven't found a setting to make this the general behaviour. As a result I wouldn't have to map each field explicitly just for making it accessible! Does this option exist? - On a class level? - On a global level? You can set it on a class level. <mapping> <class-a is-accessible="true">MyClass</class-a> ... </mapping> From

java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils from BaseClassLoader

由 拜拜、爱过 提交于 2019-12-05 00:51:38
I am getting the following error , while running my following code: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils from BaseClassLoader at org.jboss.classloader.spi.base.BaseClassLoader.loadClass(BaseClassLoader.java:448) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247) at org.dozer.util.ResourceLoader.getResource(ResourceLoader.java:53) at org.dozer.util.DefaultClassLoader.loadResource(DefaultClassLoader.java:44) at org.dozer.config.GlobalSettings.loadGlobalSettings(GlobalSettings.java:116) at org.dozer.config.GlobalSettings.<init>(GlobalSettings.java:67) at org
订阅 dozer