datacontractserializer

问题 I have 2 classes [DataContract, KnownType(typeof(B))] public class A { [DataMember] public string prop1 { get; set; } [DataMember] public string prop2 { get; set; } [DataMember] public string prop3 { get; set; } } [DataContract] public class B : A { [DataMember] public string prop4 { get; set; } } and the following method: List<B> BList = new List<B>(); BList = new List<B>() { new B() { prop1 = "1", prop2 = "2", prop3 = "3", prop4 = "4" } }; List<A> AList = BList.Cast<A>().ToList();

问题 I have these classes: [DataContract] public class ErrorBase {} [DataContract] public class FileMissingError: ErrorBase {} [DataContract] public class ResponseFileInquiry { [DataMember] public List<ErrorBase> errors {get;set;}; } An instance of the class ResponseFileInquiry is what my service method returns to the client. Now, if I fill ResponseFileInquiry.errors with instances of ErrorBase, everything works fine, but if I add an instance of inherited type FileMissingError, I get a service

问题 With the XmlSerializer I can have my members in different namespaces to the parent type. Can I do the same thing with DataContractSerializer ? I would like the following XML: <h:Type xmlns:h="http://schemas.e.com/WebServices" xmlns="http://schemas.e.com/WebServices"> <Member xmlns="http://schemas.e.com/CoreTypes">0</Member> </h:Type> Is this possible in with DataContractSerializer ? 回答1: You can define subdatacontracts in different namespaces and use them as members of another datacontract,

问题 With the XmlSerializer I can have my members in different namespaces to the parent type. Can I do the same thing with DataContractSerializer ? I would like the following XML: <h:Type xmlns:h="http://schemas.e.com/WebServices" xmlns="http://schemas.e.com/WebServices"> <Member xmlns="http://schemas.e.com/CoreTypes">0</Member> </h:Type> Is this possible in with DataContractSerializer ? 回答1: You can define subdatacontracts in different namespaces and use them as members of another datacontract,

问题 When I call a web service operation, WCF deserializes the message to the proxy class with the DataContractSerializer: why couldn't I do the same ? Here is the soap message in the file ActLoginResponse.xml: <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENC="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:ns1="urn:PlotiIntf" xmlns:ns2="urn:PlotiIntf-IPloti" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema

问题 Is there a way to change how the DataContractJsonSerializer serializes dates? Currently, it'll convert a date to something like: { "date": "/Date(1260597600000-0600)/" } I would rather have it serialize as just the milliseconds since utc 1970. That way, other languages can easily work with the json data. 回答1: No, there's no hook in the serializer itself to do that. But you can use some of the serialization callbacks to implement this same behavior. You'd create another data member (of type

问题 We have an Ajax web service hosted in an ASP.NET application. This service accepts a DateTime parameter which, for the purposes of this question, should receive the DateTime equivalent of /Date(1359727200000-0200)/ , which is a MS-JSON literal for Feb 1, 2013 9:00 AM in Brazil time. This literal is what the browser sends within the Ajax request. But instead of receiving that date and time, the argument passed to the service method is Feb 1, 2013 12:00 PM . To make matters worse, the argument

问题 We have an Ajax web service hosted in an ASP.NET application. This service accepts a DateTime parameter which, for the purposes of this question, should receive the DateTime equivalent of /Date(1359727200000-0200)/ , which is a MS-JSON literal for Feb 1, 2013 9:00 AM in Brazil time. This literal is what the browser sends within the Ajax request. But instead of receiving that date and time, the argument passed to the service method is Feb 1, 2013 12:00 PM . To make matters worse, the argument

问题 I would like to force svcutil to generate all data contracts in an assembly that is used by WCF, regardless of whether or not a type is referenced by a given operation contract. [DataContract] public class Foo { } [DataContract] public class Bar : Foo { } [ServiceContract] public interface IService { [OperationContract] void Get(Foo foo); } Given this setup I cannot get svcutil to generate a version of Bar as there are no operation contracts that currently reference it. Is there a way to

问题 I would like to force svcutil to generate all data contracts in an assembly that is used by WCF, regardless of whether or not a type is referenced by a given operation contract. [DataContract] public class Foo { } [DataContract] public class Bar : Foo { } [ServiceContract] public interface IService { [OperationContract] void Get(Foo foo); } Given this setup I cannot get svcutil to generate a version of Bar as there are no operation contracts that currently reference it. Is there a way to