data-distribution-service

Remove read topic from DDS

由 安稳与你 提交于 2019-12-07 13:15:49
问题 I have a problem with subscribing the data (using the java platform). When a subscriber subscribes to a topic, that subscribed data must be removed from the DDS. But in my case whenever I subscribe to the data the same data is subscribed many times. The data is not removed from the DDS. I tried with QoS but I don't know how to use it. Please suggest how I can remove the read data from the DDS. 回答1: This behavior is not caused by your QoS settings, but by your method of accessing the

DDS - Which one is recommended - OpenSplice or CoreDX? [closed]

由 吃可爱长大的小学妹 提交于 2019-12-05 21:55:00
Closed . This question is opinion-based . It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post . Closed 7 months ago . I need for C# winform app and for android native application to use DDS(Data Distribution Service). Each one can be subscriber and writer. What is important for me: - High performance. - Easy to use and documentation. - Support. - Low price. What is best recommended product to use - OpenSplice or CoreDX? What the differences between them? Thank Unfortunately I can't tell

DDS vs AMQP vs ZeroMQ [closed]

由 风格不统一 提交于 2019-12-05 13:51:56
问题 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 7 years ago . I wanted a feedback on whether my evaluations and concerns are correct. I have been reseaching the three, Data Distribution Service,

DDS vs AMQP vs ZeroMQ [closed]

由 ♀尐吖头ヾ 提交于 2019-12-04 02:05:54
I wanted a feedback on whether my evaluations and concerns are correct. I have been reseaching the three, Data Distribution Service, AMQP and ZeroMQ for sometime now for building a data transport layer in a datacenter. All the three look promising, yet i encountered some blocking issues in few. To give a context, my requirements are: Scale upto 500+ physical nodes, 1000+ publishers and subscribers. Support durable delivery of messages to take care of failing subscribers. The aggregated throughput should be north of 1 Million messages / sec Problems with AMQP: The Broker architecture seems to

WHY / WHEN using rather DDS instead of ZeroMQ? [closed]

由 十年热恋 提交于 2019-12-03 11:16:57
问题 Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post. Closed 4 years ago . I read the followings: DDS vs AMQP vs ZeroMQ http://mnb.ociweb.com/mnb/MiddlewareNewsBrief-201004.html And it seems that there is no benfit using DDS instead of zmq: the latency of zmq is better. It seem to me that the API of ZMQ is cleared and simple. I cant use ZMQ in order

WHY / WHEN using rather DDS instead of ZeroMQ? [closed]

由 浪尽此生 提交于 2019-12-03 02:49:51
Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post . I read the followings: DDS vs AMQP vs ZeroMQ http://mnb.ociweb.com/mnb/MiddlewareNewsBrief-201004.html And it seems that there is no benfit using DDS instead of zmq: the latency of zmq is better. It seem to me that the API of ZMQ is cleared and simple. I cant use ZMQ in order to transfer data between threads / processes / stations. So: When it is better to use DDS ? Are there any
订阅 data-distribution-service