code-coverage

“Analyze Code Coverage” option missing in Visual Studio 2017 Professional

 ̄綄美尐妖づ 提交于 2020-01-14 07:44:06
问题 Is any options available to enable options in "Test->Analyze Code Coverage"? Is another way to run the code coverage result? 回答1: Code Coverage is an Enterprise Edition feature, not available in Professional. Credits: @Damien_The_Unbeliever. Thanks for you answer in comments. Its helped me. 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53096193/analyze-code-coverage-option-missing-in-visual-studio-2017-professional

Find a good way to get a coverage report with karma?

我们两清 提交于 2020-01-14 06:29:12
问题 I'm using karma-coverage + browserify + angular. The result i get from coverage is that 100% of the files under test are covered which is not true. Any idea how to make this work? This is my file karma.conf.js : // Karma configuration module.exports = function (config) { config.set({ // base path that will be used to resolve all patterns (eg. files, exclude) basePath: './', // frameworks to use // available frameworks: https://npmjs.org/browse/keyword/karma-adapter frameworks: ['browserify',

Unexpected token while running karma-coverage on Typescript project

删除回忆录丶 提交于 2020-01-13 07:52:25
问题 I have a basic Angular/Typescript project with 12 rudimentary unit tests that run perfectly fine. Now I would like to get the coverage for these tests. I tried various approaches, and none of them worked, so I decided to start over with karma-coverage and ask for help here. :-) Currently, when I run karma, I get an error message for every single source file that looks like this: Failed to parse file: C:/Users/FRBA/Documents/MyProject/src/app/nav/new-panel/new-panel.component.ts 07 07 2017 07

PyCharm, Django: zero code coverage

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2020-01-12 13:47:42
问题 PyCharm has a "Run with Coverage" action for Django test targets. This runs the tests, but shows zero test coverage (0% files, not covered in the project pane, and all red in the editor). Checking or unchecking "Use bundled coverage.py" makes no difference. Running the same tests from the CLI gives the expected results: $ coverage --version Coverage.py, version 3.5.1. http://nedbatchelder.com/code/coverage $ coverage run ./manage.py test blackbox Creating test database for alias 'default'...

Opencover with multiple assemblies

Deadly 提交于 2020-01-12 12:48:25
问题 I am trying to combine three unit testing projects (three different dlls) into one OpenCover report. Is it possible? I tried to look into filters but I don't see enough detail (examples) in the OpenCover Wiki site. Can someone shed some lights on where I can start? Thanks a lot! 回答1: Yes it is possible. If you are using nunit (or some other test runner) you can (usually) run all test assemblies at the same time e.g. opencover.console.exe -register:user "-target:nunit-console.exe" "-targetargs

Code coverage for Android (calabash-android BDD)

南笙酒味 提交于 2020-01-12 09:35:54
问题 I'm testing my android application using calabash-android which provides it's own "test project", with a script that renames it's package to reflect the app under test, and then uses an InstrumentationTestRunner subclass: adb shell am instrument -w -e class sh.calaba.instrumentationbackend.InstrumentationBackend #{ENV['TEST_PACKAGE_NAME']}/sh.calaba.instrumentationbackend.CalabashInstrumentationTestRunner I'll accept any answer that allows me to generate a code coverage report similar to Emma

Coverage analysis for Functional Tests

北城余情 提交于 2020-01-11 17:39:29
问题 In the project that I am working on, we have functional tests written over Selenium. The application undergoes functional changes with each feature release. Is there a tool / mechanism that we can keep track of the gaps in automated functional tests, so that at least the manual testers can keep an eye for these areas? Note: we are not doing FTDD, so the functional test coverage can be quite poor, even though we ensure high unit test coverage. We use NCover to check unit test coverage. 回答1:

GCC6.3.0: flag “--coverage” not functioning (no gdca files generated)

血红的双手。 提交于 2020-01-11 12:56:29
问题 Having a code snippet in C and the same in C++, which generates gdca files executing the exe which is compiled with GCC 4.1.2. The same code snippet compiled with GCC6.3.0 after executing is not generating gdca files, not the C.exe not the c++.exe I found out that the implementation of the gcov library is different, in GCC4.1.2 and GCC6.3.0, the version of the gcov library in GCC6.3.0 seems to be empty: _gcov_merge_add.o: file format elf32-i386 Disassembly of section .text: 00000000 <__gcov

Android Coverage launch with JaCoCo

半世苍凉 提交于 2020-01-11 12:37:52
问题 We have an Android application that we are building with Gradle/Android Studio and are using JaCoCo to generate code coverage reports for our unit tests; this is working great. We are also interested in being able to generate coverage reports for manual tests as well; that is, show what code was covered in an arbitrary application launch. It appears that JaCoCo's predecessor EclEmma was capable of this, but I have not been able to find any confirmation one way or the other about JaCoCo

OpenCover MSBuild Integration - No results generated

时光毁灭记忆、已成空白 提交于 2020-01-11 09:21:51
问题 After getting OpenCover to work on my machine, the next step is getting it to work with the build server. I've been trying to integrate OpenCover with MSBuild on a Bamboo Build Server. I have modified Build.proj as follows to run OpenCover after building the solution: <Target Name="TestAndCodeCoverage" DependsOnTargets="Build" > <Message Text="Executing Unit Tests and running OpenCover to check code coverage..." /> <MakeDir Directories="Coverage" /> <Exec Command='"C:\Program Files (x86)