break

Using AutoHotKey, I have a rather simple loop script that I want to be able to break by the stroke of a key. I tried a few different codes from websites but it doesn't seem to work. Here's the code: #g:: Loop 20 { MouseClick, left, 142, 542 Sleep, 1000 MouseClick, left, 138, 567 Sleep, 1500 MouseClick, left, 97, 538 Sleep, 1000 } Use a global variable (keepCycling) and toggle it to break the loop. Global variables should be declared in the beginning of a script. Adding a global variable might be the easiest solution for your case since your loop takes a while to complete. global break_g = 0 #b

* switch-case语句---分支语句---多分支语句 * 语法: switch(表达式){ case 值1:代码1;break; case 值2:代码2;break; case 值3:代码3;break; case 值4:代码4;break; ...多个case default:代码5; } *注意问题: * default后面的break是可以省略的 * default也可以省略 * switch-case 语句中和case后面的值比较的时候使用的是严格的模式 * break是可以省略 执行过程: * 获取表达式的值,和值1比较,如果一样,则执行代码1,遇到break则跳出整个的语句,后面代码不执行 * 如果表达式的值和值1不一样,则和值2比较,如果相同则执行代码2,遇到break则跳出 * 否则和值3比较,相同则执行代码3,遇到break,跳出；否则和值4比较,相同则执行代码4,遇到break则跳出；否则直接执行代码5 练习:获取一个人的成绩的级别,如果是A级则显示90到100直接的分数 * 如果是B级则显示80到90分 * 如果是C级则显示70到80之间分数 * 如果是D级则显示60到70分之间 * 否则显示0到59之间 var jiBie = "E"; switch (jiBie) { case "A": console.log("90到100之间"); break

We have an asp.net core 2.0 project (migrated from 1.x) running on Vs2017.3 (updated from 2017.2). After the update, breakpoints stop being hit. Vs reports that "The breakpoint will not currently be hit. The source code is different from the original version". Things were normal before updating and migration. The problem can be seen after updating to 2017.3 and before migrating to asp.net core 2.0. I know about the workaround: To right-click and force the breakpoint to be hit even when the source codes are different. I need a solution. Clean-rebuild has no effect. The problem occurs on

do I need to use break here or will it stop looping and just return once? for($i = 0; $i < 5; $i ++) { if($var[$i] === '') return false; // break; } Thank you! It will run just once, stop looping, and exit from the function/method. It could be argued though that this is bad style. It is very easy to overlook that return later, which is bad for debugging and maintenance. Using break might be cleaner: for($i = 0; $i < 5; $i ++) { if($var[$i] === '') { set_some_condition; break; } } if (some_condition) return; If you use return , your function (or entire script) will return - all code after that

Is there a way to break out of a <g:each>? I have a page wherein I'm iterating through a list and I have to make sure that a checkbox is checked if that was the value stored in DB. To make it a little clearer, please consider something like: <g:each in=${list1}> <g:each in=${list2}> <g:if test="${list1.id == list2.id}"> <input type="checkbox" ... checked="checked" /> </if> </g:each> ... </g:each> where list1 is, say Domain1.list() (i.e. ALL possible values) and list2 is Domain2.find(...) (i.e. SELECTED values) In the g:each, I need to display ALL of list1 (hence, the "..." after the inner each

Is it possible to break out of an underscore each loop..? _.each(obj, function(v,i){ if(i > 2){ break // <~ does not work } // some code here // ... }) Is there another design pattern I can be using? I don't think you can, so you will just have to wrap the contents of the function in i < 2 or use return . It may make more sense to use .some or .every . EDIT: //pseudo break _.each(obj, function (v, i) { if (i <= 2) { // some code here // ... } }); The issue with the above is of course that it has to do the entire loop, but that is simply a weakness of underscore's each . You could use .every ,

这个是断点失效，把那个断点双击清理掉就完了。 具体原因，以后再写。 来源： https://www.cnblogs.com/xiangtunmizu/p/11846244.html

In short, I'm utilizing C# to scientific computation and I've written a method that has a while loop that may run to a user-specified quantity of steps... Actually, this method may take too long to execute (like more than 5 hours). When it takes this long, I may want to stop the method pressing Esc key, for example. As I read something about breaking while , it is as simple as a Boolean flag or something like this. So I thought in something like this: public Double? Run(int n) { int i = 0; while ((i < n) && (/* inputkey != ConsoleKey.Escape */)) { // here goes the heavy computation thing //