boilerplate

问题 Which safety net do you use? use warnings; or use strict; I know that A potential problem caught by use strict; will cause your code to stop immediately when it is encountered, while use warnings; will merely give a warning (like the command-line switch -w) and let your code run. Still I want to know that which one is mostly used by the Perl-programmers. Which one they have seen being used the most? 回答1: use strict generates an error if you use symbolic references (ie, strings to represent

问题 A coworker had never heard of this, and I couldn't provide a real definition. For me, it's always been an instance of 'I-know-it-when-I-see-it'. Bonus question, who originated the term? 回答1: "boilerplate code" is any seemingly repetitive code that shows up again and again in order to get some result that seems like it ought to be much simpler. It's a subjective definition. The term comes from "boilerplate" in the newspaper industry: wiki 回答2: On the etymology the term boilerplate : from http:

问题 I have a some simple Java code that looks similar to this in its structure: abstract public class BaseClass { String someString; public BaseClass(String someString) { this.someString = someString; } abstract public String getName(); } public class ACSubClass extends BaseClass { public ASubClass(String someString) { super(someString); } public String getName() { return \"name value for ASubClass\"; } } I will have quite a few subclasses of BaseClass , each implementing the getName() method in