bcompiler | 易学教程

What are the benefits of the different PHP compression libraries?

阅读更多关于 What are the benefits of the different PHP compression libraries?

问题 I've been looking into ways to compress PHP libraries, and I've found several libraries which might be useful, but I really don't know much about them. I've specifically been reading about bcompiler and PHAR libraries. Is there any performance benefit in either of these? Are there any "gotchas" I need to watch out for? What are the relative benefits? Do either of them add to/detract from performance? I'm also interested in learning of other libs which might be out there which are not obvious

Where can I find the bcompiler dll for xampp 1.8.2(PHP 5.4.X)

阅读更多关于 Where can I find the bcompiler dll for xampp 1.8.2(PHP 5.4.X)

问题 I am using xampp 1.8.2 on windows xp and bcompiler dll is not present in the ext directory. I installed older xampp(1.7.1) on windows XP and bcompiler dll was included in the ext directory. where can I find the bcompiler dll for xampp 1.8.2(PHP 5.4.X). The latest dll I could found on internet was for PHP 5.3.X. I saw some posts talking about compiling it using Microsoft SDK incuding Microsoft compilers, but I have no idea about it. Can somebody compile it and make it available for download

How safe is PHP bcompiler encoded code?

阅读更多关于 How safe is PHP bcompiler encoded code?

问题 I'm interested if anyone knows exactly how effective/safe/protected PHP's bcompiler is against reverse engineering. The introduction page makes a bold claim: In terms of code protection, it is safe to say that it would be impossible to recreate the exact source code that it was built from, and without the accompanying source code comments. It would effectively be useless to use the bcompiler bytecodes to recreate and modify a class. Perhaps the key word is "exact" -- how true is their claim

How safe is PHP bcompiler encoded code?

阅读更多关于 How safe is PHP bcompiler encoded code?

I'm interested if anyone knows exactly how effective/safe/protected PHP's bcompiler is against reverse engineering. The introduction page makes a bold claim: In terms of code protection, it is safe to say that it would be impossible to recreate the exact source code that it was built from, and without the accompanying source code comments. It would effectively be useless to use the bcompiler bytecodes to recreate and modify a class. Perhaps the key word is "exact" -- how true is their claim if you remove it? PS - Please, no lectures about compilation/obfuscation versus licensing. :) It is just