bandwidth

I've published an android app 2 weeks ago called MyPetrol and within three days hit roughly 90k users in Malaysia. After that, I took down the app due to huge Firebase Database bandwidth consumption (117GB for the 3 days). I'm a self-taught hobbyist who do not come from IT related background, so I'm really troubled by this. Hope that someone can help. The app is a crowd-sourcing app for petrol price. User can enter the price of petrol at a particular station and other users who agree with the stated price can "like" it. Once a price is updated, the "like" count is reset. Upon opening the app,

I'm about to host a small socket server on a local computer and I'd like to know what kind of bandwidth it's going to use. On most days it will have no more than 50 clients connected at once, but once or twice a week it could have as many as 5,000+ clients at once. However, the only messages sent will be an occasional single message to all connected clients at once with no extra data or anything. Will the server cause a significant drop in performance on the computer it's hosted on or slow down my internet speeds at all? Server.js: var app = require('http').createServer(handler) , io = require

What is the best way to reduce the size of the viewstate hidden field in JSF? I have noticed that my view state is approximately 40k this goes down to the client and back to the server on every request and response espically coming to the server this is a significant slowdown for the user. My Environment JSF 1.2, MyFaces, Tomcat, Tomahawk, RichFaces Cristian Vat Have you tried setting the state saving to server? This should only send an id to the client, and keep the full state on the server. Simply add the following to the file web.xml : <context-param> <param-name>javax.faces.STATE_SAVING

I have an application that has a TCP client and a server. I set up the client and server on separate machines. Now I want to measure how much bandwidth is being consumed ( bytes sent and received during a single run of the application). I have discovered that wireshark is one such tool that can help me get this statistic. However, wireshark seems to be GUI dependent. What I wanted was a way to automate the measuring and reporting of this statistic. I dont care about the information about individual packets captured by wireshark. I dont need that information. Is there some way to run wireshark

Im sending multiple udp packets consecutively to a remote pc. the problem is, if the amount of data is too high, some device somewhere between the channel experience buffer overflow. i intent to limit/throttle/control sending rate of the udp packets. can somebody give me some guide on how to find the optimal rate sending interval? By the way, please stop suggesting tcp over udp. the objective is not to send data reliably, but to measure maximum throughput. Trial and error. Point. Make up a secnod connection (UDP or TCP based) that you use ONLY to send control commands. Send stats there about

How do I collect bandwidth usage/utilzation on devices/switches. From what I understand there are systems that do something like this. They seem to all have snmp in common. I am looking for imformation on possibly rolling my own system for collecting this data that will be later used on a web-based front-end. For a real-world but perhaps a bit over complicated example of what I'm talking about take a look at ubersmith de . Most of it will be in a LAMP environment. Thanks. On pure SNMP point of view, there is a Management Information Base (MIB) on your SNMP device. This base is a kind of tree

I'm transferring data from one base to another via database links (using INSERT INTO SELECT ... ). I want to know if data transferred through the link is compressed or can be compressed to avoid too much network use. I have very little bandwidth, and I think that would help if it's not already done. There's some de-duplication but no serious compression. There is a UTL_COMPRESS function but it would be tricky to get that to decompress on the destination (maybe a trigger, or instead of view - but it is clunky). EXPDP can use a database link ( NETWORK_LINK ) and, in 11g, compression but that