backpressure

How to use Akka BoundedMailBox to throttle a producer

被刻印的时光 ゝ 提交于 2019-12-10 17:49:04
问题 I have two actors, one is producing messages and the other is consuming the messages at a fixed rate . Is it possible to have the producer throttled by the consumers BoundedMailBox? (back pressure) My producer is currently periodically scheduled (sending it a tick message), is there a way to have it scheduled by availability in the consumers mailbox instead? I am using fire and forget style ( consumer.tell() ) since I do not need a response. Should I be using different message sending

How to do akka-http request-level backpressure?

徘徊边缘 提交于 2019-12-07 19:59:04
问题 In akka-http, you can: Set akka.http.server.max-connections, which will prevent more than that number of connections. Exceeding this limit means clients will get connection timeouts. Set akka.http.server.pipelining-limit, which prevents a given connection from having more than this number of requests outstanding at once. Exceeding this means clients will get socket timeouts. These are both forms of backpressure from the http server to the client, but both are very low level, and only

How to do akka-http request-level backpressure?

岁酱吖の 提交于 2019-12-06 12:09:48
In akka-http, you can: Set akka.http.server.max-connections, which will prevent more than that number of connections. Exceeding this limit means clients will get connection timeouts. Set akka.http.server.pipelining-limit, which prevents a given connection from having more than this number of requests outstanding at once. Exceeding this means clients will get socket timeouts. These are both forms of backpressure from the http server to the client, but both are very low level, and only indirectly related to your server's performance. What seems better would be to backpressure at the http level,

Back pressure in Kafka

我的未来我决定 提交于 2019-12-05 21:19:20
I have a situation in Kafka where the producer publishes the messages at a very higher rate than the consumer consumption rate. I have to implement the back pressure implementation in kafka for further consumption and processing. Please let me know how can I implement in spark and also in normal java api. Kafka acts as the regulator here. You produce at whatever rate you want to into Kafka, scaling the brokers out to accommodate the ingest rate. You then consume as you want to; Kafka persists the data and tracks the offset of the consumers as they work their way through the data they read. You

Node.JS Unbounded Concurrency / Stream backpressure over TCP

倖福魔咒の 提交于 2019-12-04 08:50:37
问题 As I understand it, one of the consequences of Node's evented IO model is the inability to tell a Node process that is (for example) receiving data over a TCP socket, to block, once you've hooked up your receiving event handlers (or otherwise started listening for data). If the receiver can't process the incoming data fast enough, "unbounded concurrency" can result, whereby node under-the-hood continues to read data off the socket as fast as it can, scheduling new data events on the event

How to handle backpressure using google cloud functions

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2019-12-01 23:00:40
Using google cloud functions, is there a way to manage execution concurrency the way AWS Lambda is doing? ( https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/concurrent-executions.html ) My intent is to design a function that consumes a file of tasks and publish those tasks to a work queue (pub/sub). I want to have a function that consumes tasks from the work queue (pub/sub) and execute the task. The above could result in a large number of almost concurrent execution. My dowstream consumer service is slow and cannot consume many concurrent requests at a time. In all likelyhood, it would return HTTP

RxJs: lossy form of zip operator

别来无恙 提交于 2019-11-30 04:38:51
问题 Consider using the zip operator to zip together two infinite Observables, one of which emits items twice as frequently as the other. The current implementation is loss-less, i.e. if I keep these Observables emitting for an hour and then I switch between their emitting rates, the first Observable will eventually catch up with the other. This will cause memory explosion at some point as the buffer grows larger and larger. The same will happen if first observable will emit items for several

What is the best way to get backpressure for Cassandra Writes?

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2019-11-29 03:42:06
问题 I have a service that consumes messages off of a queue at a rate that I control. I do some processing and then attempt to write to a Cassandra cluster via the Datastax Java client. I have setup my Cassandra cluster with maxRequestsPerConnection and maxConnectionsPerHost . However, in testing I have found that when I have reached maxConnectionsPerHost and maxRequestsPerConnection calls to session.executeAsync don't block. What I am doing right now is using a new Semaphore(maxConnectionsPerHost

Backpressure mechanism in Spring Web-Flux

孤街醉人 提交于 2019-11-28 16:20:15
问题 I'm a starter in Spring Web-Flux . I wrote a controller as follows: @RestController public class FirstController { @GetMapping("/first") public Mono<String> getAllTweets() { return Mono.just("I am First Mono") } } I know one of the reactive benefits is Backpressure , and it can balance the request or the response rate. I want to realize how to have backpressure mechanism in Spring Web-Flux . 回答1: Backpressure in WebFlux In order to understand how Backpressure works in the current