arm

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60395608/what-does-the-character-do-in-arm-assembly

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60371470/how-is-part-of-ldm-r1-r2-instruction-in-armv6-m-architecture-encoded

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63038207/invalid-constant-after-fixup-and-mask

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50284222/u-boot-for-beaglebone-black-wont-build-target-cpu-does-not-support-thumb-inst

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50284222/u-boot-for-beaglebone-black-wont-build-target-cpu-does-not-support-thumb-inst

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50284222/u-boot-for-beaglebone-black-wont-build-target-cpu-does-not-support-thumb-inst

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54482519/avoid-cmake-to-add-the-flags-search-paths-first-and-headerpad-max-install-name

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54482519/avoid-cmake-to-add-the-flags-search-paths-first-and-headerpad-max-install-name

问题 I want to disable the low level cache on an ARMv8-A platform running Linux, in order to measure performance of optimized code, independent of cache access. For Intel systems I found the following resource (Is there a way to disable CPU cache (L1/L2) on a Linux system?), but I can not directly be applied directly due to a different instruction set. So far I have a kernel module which alters the corresponding system register to disable instruction and data cache. #include <linux/module.h> int

问题 I want to disable the low level cache on an ARMv8-A platform running Linux, in order to measure performance of optimized code, independent of cache access. For Intel systems I found the following resource (Is there a way to disable CPU cache (L1/L2) on a Linux system?), but I can not directly be applied directly due to a different instruction set. So far I have a kernel module which alters the corresponding system register to disable instruction and data cache. #include <linux/module.h> int