3-way-merge

Why does 'git mergetool' (meld) show conflict markers?

由 孤者浪人 提交于 2019-12-20 10:46:09
问题 Why does 'git mergetool' (meld) show me the ancestor view WITH conclict markers? This is totally wrong and I've never understood why it does this. How can I fix it? A 3 way merge should show [ Your Changes ] [ Common Base ] [ Upstream Changes ] What I get is: [ My Changes ] [ File with Conflict markers ] [ Upstream changes ] See: 回答1: looks like you don't have the parameter names done correctly in the config. You should see things like $BASE, $REMOTE, etc. Make sure these are as specified in

Git & ApartCI - How to verify code conflicts before inviting functional breakage?

由 六月ゝ 毕业季﹏ 提交于 2019-12-11 06:35:18
问题 Following Trunk Based Development, shown below: Assume there are two short-lived feature branches( f1 and f2 ) created from master (trunk). For implementation, source code files used for these branches overlap , in this scenario. Assume, there is one CI/CD pipeline for master (trunk) that gets triggered on code change. One code conflict that can be possible is functional, f1 could remove or modify existing source code that f2 uses.... This is not a VCS conflict . Developer1 has perform git

How does the 3 way merge in Mercurial/Meld work?

由 一世执手 提交于 2019-12-03 03:34:19
问题 I'm working on a project where I have a commit that introduced a feature with major problems that weren't discovered immediately. Now I want to completely remove that revision while keeping the work following it but i'm having a hard time wrapping my head around this 3 way merge. Here is a simplified graph of my project. o changeset: 134:7f81764aa03a | tag: tip | parent: 128:451d8a19edea | summary: Backed out changeset 451d8a19edea | | @ changeset: 133:5eefa40e2a29 | | summary: (Change I need

Why does 'git mergetool' (meld) show conflict markers?

由 ∥☆過路亽．° 提交于 2019-12-02 23:46:08
Why does 'git mergetool' (meld) show me the ancestor view WITH conclict markers? This is totally wrong and I've never understood why it does this. How can I fix it? A 3 way merge should show [ Your Changes ] [ Common Base ] [ Upstream Changes ] What I get is: [ My Changes ] [ File with Conflict markers ] [ Upstream changes ] See: looks like you don't have the parameter names done correctly in the config. You should see things like $BASE, $REMOTE, etc. Make sure these are as specified in the documentation for 'meld' OR you have committed, by accident, an unresolved file. To check for this do a

How does the 3 way merge in Mercurial/Meld work?

由 守給你的承諾、 提交于 2019-12-02 17:04:44
I'm working on a project where I have a commit that introduced a feature with major problems that weren't discovered immediately. Now I want to completely remove that revision while keeping the work following it but i'm having a hard time wrapping my head around this 3 way merge. Here is a simplified graph of my project. o changeset: 134:7f81764aa03a | tag: tip | parent: 128:451d8a19edea | summary: Backed out changeset 451d8a19edea | | @ changeset: 133:5eefa40e2a29 | | summary: (Change I need to keep keep) | | *snip 3 commits* | o changeset: 129:5f6182a97d40 |/ summary: (Change I need to keep

Does git revert also use the 3-way-merge?

由 可紊 提交于 2019-12-02 10:39:49
问题 When I run git revert , it can happen, that a conflict occurs. Does git rely on the 3-way-merge, as it is depicted in the question merge internals (cf. table below) also for revert ? What is the merge base for a revert? In What are the three files in a 3-way merge for interactive rebasing using git and meld? it is quite clear, but its hard to imagine this for a revert. A - B - C - D - C^-1 (If I want to revert C at the end.) 回答1: Yes, there is a base. (Side note: this code has changed a lot
订阅 3-way-merge