If you were to define some extension methods, properties in an assembly written in F#, and then use that assembly in C#, would you see the defined extensions in C#?
If so, that would be so cool.
If you were to define some extension methods, properties in an assembly written in F#, and then use that assembly in C#, would you see the defined extensions in C#?
If so, that would be so cool.
[] module Methods = [] let Exists(opt : string option) = match opt with | Some _ -> true | None -> false
This method could be used in C# only by adding the namespace (using using) to the file where it will be used.
if (p2.Description.Exists()) { ...}
Here is a link to the original blogpost.
Answering question in comments "Extension Static Methods":
namespace ExtensionFSharp module CollectionExtensions = type System.Linq.Enumerable with static member RangeChar(first:char, last:char) = {first .. last}
In F# you call it like so:
open System.Linq open ExtensionFSharp.CollectionExtensions let rangeChar = Enumerable.RangeChar('a', 'z') printfn "Contains %i items" rangeChar.CountItems
In C# you call it like so:
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using ExtensionFSharp; class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { var method = typeof (CollectionExtensions).GetMethod("Enumerable.RangeChar.2.static"); var rangeChar = (IEnumerable) method.Invoke(null, new object[] {'a', 'z'}); foreach (var c in rangeChar) { Console.WriteLine(c); } } }
Now, give me my freaking medal!
Despite my other answer, I did just try this with the F# CTP (on VS shell) and C# Express from my box at home (all free dev tools!), and this works:
F#
#light namespace MyFSharp // C# way [] module ExtensionMethods = [] let Great(s : System.String) = "Great" // F# way type System.String with member this.Awesome() = "Awesome" let example = "foo".Awesome()
C#
using System; using MyFSharp; // reference the F# dll class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { var s = "foo"; //s.Awesome(); // no Console.WriteLine(s.Great()); // yes } }
I was not aware you could do this; nifty. Credit to @alex.
Per the language spec, section 10.7 "Type extensions":
Optional extension members are syntactic sugar for static members. Uses of optional extension members elaborate to calls to static members with encoded names where the object is passed as the first argument. The encoding of names is not specified in this release of F# and is not compatible with C# encodings of C# extension members
For some reason, the accepted answer suggests using reflection to get an F# type extension method. Since the compiled method name is different between versions of F#, and may be different depending on arguments, inlining and other naming related issues, I would rather suggest using CompiledNameAttribute
instead, which is much easier and blends in easily with C#. Besides, no reflection (and its performance and type safety issues) necessary.
Suppose you have this in F#:
namespace Foo.Bar module StringExt = type System.String with static member ToInteger s = System.Int64