可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
I have a signal of electromyographical data that I am supposed (scientific papers' explicit recommendation) to smooth using RMS.
I have the following working code, producing the desired output, but it is way slower than I think it's possible.
#!/usr/bin/python import numpy def rms(interval, halfwindow): """ performs the moving-window smoothing of a signal using RMS """ n = len(interval) rms_signal = numpy.zeros(n) for i in range(n): small_index = max(0, i - halfwindow) # intended to avoid boundary effect big_index = min(n, i + halfwindow) # intended to avoid boundary effect window_samples = interval[small_index:big_index] # here is the RMS of the window, being attributed to rms_signal 'i'th sample: rms_signal[i] = sqrt(sum([s**2 for s in window_samples])/len(window_samples)) return rms_signal
I have seen some deque
and itertools
suggestions regarding optimization of moving window loops, and also convolve
from numpy, but I couldn't figure it out how to accomplish what I want using them.
Also, I do not care to avoid boundary problems anymore, because I end up having large arrays and relatively small sliding windows.
Thanks for reading
回答1:
It is possible to use convolution to perform the operation you are referring to. I did it a few times for processing EEG signals as well.
import numpy as np def window_rms(a, window_size): a2 = np.power(a,2) window = np.ones(window_size)/float(window_size) return np.sqrt(np.convolve(a2, window, 'valid'))
Breaking it down, the np.power(a, 2)
part makes a new array with the same dimension as a
, but where each value is squared. np.ones(window_size)/float(window_size)
produces an array or length window_size
where each element is 1/window_size
. So the convolution effectively produces a new array where each element i
is equal to
(a[i]^2 + a[i+1]^2 + … + a[i+window_size]^2)/window_size
which is the RMS value of the array elements within the moving window. It should perform really well this way.
Note, though, that np.power(a, 2)
produces a new array of same dimension. If a
is really large, I mean sufficiently large that it cannot fit twice in memory, you might need a strategy where each element are modified in place. Also, the 'valid'
argument specifies to discard border effects, resulting in a smaller array produced by np.convolve()
. You could keep it all by specifying 'same'
instead (see documentation).
回答2:
Since this is not a linear transformation, I don't believe it is possible to use np.convolve().
Here's a function which should do what you want. Note that the first element of the returned array is the rms of the first full window; i.e. for the array a
in the example, the return array is the rms of the subwindows [1,2],[2,3],[3,4],[4,5]
and does not include the partial windows [1]
and [5]
.
>>> def window_rms(a, window_size=2): >>> return np.sqrt(sum([a[window_size-i-1:len(a)-i]**2 for i in range(window_size-1)])/window_size) >>> a = np.array([1,2,3,4,5]) >>> window_rms(a) array([ 1.41421356, 2.44948974, 3.46410162, 4.47213595])