Why do R and statsmodels give slightly different ANOVA results?

Question

Using a small R sample dataset and the ANOVA example from statsmodels, the degrees of freedom for one of the variables are reported differently, & the F-values results are also slightly different. Perhaps they have slightly different default approaches? Can I set up statsmodels to use R's defaults?

import pandas as pd
import statsmodels.api as sm
from statsmodels.formula.api import ols


##R code on R sample dataset

#> anova(with(ChickWeight, lm(weight ~ Time + Diet)))
#Analysis of Variance Table
#
#Response: weight
#           Df  Sum Sq Mean Sq  F value    Pr(>F)
#Time        1 2042344 2042344 1576.460 < 2.2e-16 ***
#Diet        3  129876   43292   33.417 < 2.2e-16 ***
#Residuals 573  742336    1296
#write.csv(file='ChickWeight.csv', x=ChickWeight, row.names=F)

cw = pd.read_csv('ChickWeight.csv')
cw_lm=ols('weight ~ Time + Diet', data=cw).fit()   

print(sm.stats.anova_lm(cw_lm, typ=2))
#                  sum_sq   df            F         PR(>F)
#Time      2024187.608511    1  1523.368567  9.008821e-164
#Diet       108176.538530    1    81.411791   2.730843e-18
#Residual   764035.638024  575          NaN            NaN

Head and tail of the datasets are the same*, also mean, min, max, median of weight and time.

Answer 1

Looks like "Diet" only has one degree of freedom in the statsmodels call which means it was probably treated as a continuous variable whereas in R it has 3 degrees of freedom so it probably was a factor/discrete random variable.

To make ols() treat "Diet" as a categorical random variable, use

cw_lm=ols('weight ~ C(Diet) + Time', data=cw).fit()