问题
If I run the following code, no file is created at all:
std::ofstream outputFile(strOutputLocation.c_str(), std::ios::binary);
outputFile.write((const char*)lpResLock, dwSizeRes);
outputFile.close();
However, if I add a flush() before the close, it works:
std::ofstream outputFile(strOutputLocation.c_str(), std::ios::binary);
outputFile.write((const char*)lpResLock, dwSizeRes);
outputFile.flush();
outputFile.close();
Does the standard library actually require this, or is it a bug in the Visual C++ CRT?
回答1:
It's a bug. Reading §27.8.1.10/4, abridged:
void close();
Effects: Callsrdbuf()->close()
...
What does rdbuf()->close()
do? According to §27.8.1.3/6, abridged, emphasis mine:
basic_filebuf<charT,traits>* close();
Ifis_open() == false
, returns a null pointer. If a put area exists, callsoverflow(EOF)
to flush characters. ...
That is, it's suppose to flush. (Indeed, the call to flush()
ultimately does the same thing.)
Note the call to close()
itself isn't needed, as the destructor of basic_ofstream
will call close()
.
回答2:
Are you checking the file before you exit from the program? OS will buffer all IO, so may not see any data(unless you flush) in the file before you exit.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5036878/why-does-ofstream-require-a-flush