The origin of this question is from here How to use "global static" variable in matlab function called in c.
I'm trying to encapsulate the "global variable" into an object. However I don't know how to export the matlab class to c++ using MATLAB Compiler (mcc)
To do this I just tried the standard command
Matlab Command
mcc -W cpplib:Vowel4 -T link:lib Vowel4.m
Matlab Script
classdef Vowel4
properties
x
y
end
methods
Vowel4
A
B
end
end
The generated lib is actually stand-alone functions rather than c++ class.
How can I compile classes in Matlab into c++ classes?
I've been searching for an answer but didn't find one.
Obviously the matlab command is not suitable for this scenario. However I cannot find any information on building Matlab classes into c++ classes.
========================== Edit ========================
The actual cpp code is as follows: @Alan
mclInitializeApplication(NULL, 0);
loadDataInitialize();
soundByCoefInitialize();
loadData();
mwArray F(4, 1, mxDOUBLE_CLASS);
float test[4];
for ( ;; ){
const Frame frame = controller.frame();
const FingerList fingers = frame.fingers();
if ( !fingers.empty() ){
for ( int i = 0; i < 4; i ++ ){
double v = fingers.count() > i ? (fingers[i].tipPosition().y / 50) - 2 : 0;
F(i+1,1) = v;
test[i] = v;
cout << v << ' ';
}
cout << endl;
soundByCoef(F);
}
}
Here the matlabA() corresponds to the loadData(), which loads the data, and soundByCoef(F) corresponds to the matlabB(), which do the job in the main loop.
As noted by Alan, I was only suggesting using handle class as a container for your global variables (with the benefit that such an object would be passed by reference). The created object is not intended to be directly manipulated by your C++ code (it will be stored in the generic mxArray/mwArray C/C++ struct).
As far as I know, you cannot directly compile classdef-style MATLAB classes into proper C++ classes when building shared libraries using the MATLAB Compiler. It only supports building regular functions. You could create functional interfaces to MATLAB class member methods, but that's a different story...
Perhaps a complete example would help illustrate the idea I had in mind. First lets define the code on the MATLAB side:
GlobalData.m
This is the handle class used to store the global vars.
classdef GlobalData < handle
%GLOBALDATA Handle class to encapsulate all global state data.
%
% Note that we are not taking advantage of any object-oriented programming
% concept in this code. This class acts only as a container for publicly
% accessible properties for the otherwise global variables.
%
% To manipulate these globals from C++, you should create the class API
% as normal MATLAB functions to be compiled and exposed as regular C
% functions by the shared library.
% For example: create(), get(), set(), ...
%
% The reason we use a handle-class instead of regular variables/structs
% is that handle-class objects get passed by reference.
%
properties
val
end
end
create_globals.m
A wrapper function that acts as a constructor to the above class
function globals = create_globals()
%CREATE_GLOBALS Instantiate and return global state
globals = GlobalData();
globals.val = 2;
end
fcn_add.m, fcn_times.m
MATLAB functions to be exposed as C++ functions
function out = fcn_add(globals, in)
% receives array, and return "input+val" (where val is global)
out = in + globals.val;
end
function out = fcn_times(globals, in)
% receives array, and return "input*val" (where val is global)
out = in .* globals.val;
end
With the above files stored in current directory, lets build the C++ shared library using the MATLAB Compiler:
>> mkdir out
>> mcc -W cpplib:libfoo -T link:lib -N -v -d ./out create_globals.m fcn_add.m fcn_times.m
You should expect the following generated files among others (I'm on a Windows machine):
./out/libfoo.h
./out/libfoo.dll
./out/libfoo.lib
Next, we could create a sample C++ program to test the library:
main.cpp
// Sample program that calls a C++ shared library created using
// the MATLAB Compiler.
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
// include library header generated by MATLAB Compiler
#include "libfoo.h"
int run_main(int argc, char **argv)
{
// initialize MCR
if (!mclInitializeApplication(NULL,0)) {
cerr << "Failed to init MCR" << endl;
return -1;
}
// initialize our library
if( !libfooInitialize() ) {
cerr << "Failed to init library" << endl;
return -1;
}
try {
// create global variables
mwArray globals;
create_globals(1, globals);
// create input array
double data[] = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9};
mwArray in(3, 3, mxDOUBLE_CLASS, mxREAL);
in.SetData(data, 9);
// create output array, and call library functions
mwArray out;
fcn_add(1, out, globals, in);
cout << "Added matrix:\n" << out << endl;
fcn_times(1, out, globals, in);
cout << "Multiplied matrix:\n" << out << endl;
} catch (const mwException& e) {
cerr << e.what() << endl;
return -1;
} catch (...) {
cerr << "Unexpected error thrown" << endl;
return -1;
}
// destruct our library
libfooTerminate();
// shutdown MCR
mclTerminateApplication();
return 0;
}
int main()
{
mclmcrInitialize();
return mclRunMain((mclMainFcnType)run_main, 0, NULL);
}
Lets build the standalone program:
>> mbuild -I./out main.cpp ./out/libfoo.lib -outdir ./out
And finally run the executable:
>> cd out
>> !main
Added matrix:
3 6 9
4 7 10
5 8 11
Multiplied matrix:
2 8 14
4 10 16
6 12 18
HTH
Following on from the thread in the previous post, the suggestion wasn't to wrap your functions in a class, but rather to use a class to pass about the global variable which compiling leaves you unable to use.
classdef Foo < handle
properties
value
end
methods
function obj = Foo(value)
obj.value = value;
end
end
end
Note: the class Foo extends the handle class in order to make it pass by reference, rather than pass by value. See: the comparison between handle and value classes.
function foo = matlabA()
foo = new Foo(1);
end
function matlabB(foo)
foo.value
end
As far as I know, the matlab compiler doesn't compile the code as such, but rather packages it with a copy of the MATLAB Component Runtime and writes some wrapper functions to handle invoking said runtime on the code from c/c++.
I would recommend avoiding jumping back and forth between matlab and c/c++ too much; there is bound to be some overhead to converting the datatypes and invoking the MCR. All I really use it for is wrapping up a complex but self-contained matlab script (i.e.: doesn't need to interact with the c/c++ code mid way through said script) as a function, or packaging up code for deployment to environments which don't have a full copy of matlab.
As an interesting side note: if you are calling C++ from within Matlab, and that C++ code needs access to a global variable, things are much easier. You can simply do this by wrapping your C++ code into a mexFunction and compiling that. In the places you need to access a variable which is in the Matlab workspace, you can do so using the mexGetVariablePtr which will return a read-only pointer to the data. The variable you are accessing can be in either the global workspace, or that of the function which called your mexFunction.
With this approach I would suggest liberally comment the variable that you are getting in both the C++ and Matlab code, as the link between them may not be obvious from the Matlab side; you wouldn't want someone to come along later, edit the script and wonder why it had broken.
In this case it seems that the C++ side doesn't really need access to the data, so you could refactor it to have matlab do the calling by wrapping the "get current position of fingers" code into a mexFunction, then have matlab do the loop:
data = loadData();
while(~stop) {
position = getFingerPositionMex();
soundByCoef(position, data);
}
Assuming you don't modify the data within soundByCoef Matlab will use pass by reference, so there will be no copying of the large dataset.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15747411/how-to-compile-matlab-class-into-c-lib