I have a list ul>li*5 (not always the same amount). I set a counter for which I get:
1 2 3 4 5
li:nth-child(n):before {
counter-increment: skill;
content: counter(skill);
color: white;
}
The Question Can I use the counter(skill) inside a calc() or can I add units to it px em rem % ms s
I have tried:
transition: all 250ms linear #{counter(skill)} * 1s;
transition: all 250ms linear counter(skill) * 1s;
I want to have the delay increased for example:
li 1s delay
li 2s delay
li 3s delay
li 4s delay
li Xs delay
The Question Can I use the counter(skill) inside a calc()
No. You can't.
The calc
function does not permit the use of counter
functions as its components. From the specs here - https://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#calc-notation:
Components of a
calc()
expression can be literal values orattr()
orcalc()
expressions.
There have been many requests for this but always declined. The underlying reason seems to be that the counter()
function represents (outputs) a <string>
and hence cannot be used directly in calc
. Moreover, the counters are considered very expensive for the browsers.
Reference: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Aug/0082.html
However, there have been proposals for adding a counter-value()
function which would return the value as integer and could be used in calc
. See here: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-lists-3/#counter-functions (Scroll down to see Issue 4).
So as of now, you cannot use counter
inside of calc
and the counter-value
does not exist yet.
This wouldn't necessarily be an elegant solution, but you could solve it with nth-child or using css variables. Code below, or see here: https://codepen.io/goodship11/pen/XBVeez
nth-child version:
li {
opacity: 0;
padding: 5px 0 5px 5px;
list-style: none;
background-color: rgba(200,50,255,.2);
display: block;
width: 20%;
height: 10%;
}
li:nth-child(even) { background-color: rgba(200,50,255,.5); }
@keyframes fade { 0% { opacity: 0; } 100% { opacity: 1; } }
li { animation: fade 1.5s ease-in forwards; }
/* Since you're doing an animation, chances our the number
of elements will be small, so you can just pre-define for however
many versions using nth-child. This wouldn't work for use cases
where, for example, you want a percentage of the whole instead
of a fixed number */
li:nth-child(1) { animation-delay: 1s; }
li:nth-child(2) { animation-delay: 2s; }
li:nth-child(3) { animation-delay: 3s; }
li:nth-child(4) { animation-delay: 4s; }
li:nth-child(5) { animation-delay: 5s; }
li:nth-child(6) { animation-delay: 6s; }
li:nth-child(7) { animation-delay: 7s; }
li:nth-child(8) { animation-delay: 8s; }
<ul>
<li>Thing 1</li>
<li>Thing 2</li>
<li>Thing 3</li>
<li>Thing 4</li>
<li>Thing 5</li>
</ul>
CSS variables version:
li {
opacity: 0;
padding: 5px 0 5px 5px;
list-style: none;
background-color: rgba(200,50,255,var(--fader));
display: block;
width: 20%;
height: 10%;
}
@keyframes fade { 0% { opacity: 0; } 100% { opacity: 1; } }
li { animation: fade 1.5s ease-in forwards; }
/* Below is an alternative approach using the same variable
from the opacity. I added in a scaling factor to show how you
can use one variable for multiple things in cases like this. */
:root {--factor: .5; }
li { animation-delay: calc(10s * var(--fader) * var(--factor));}
<ul>
<!-- You can define the variable in-line, useful for in
cases where you're writing the html manually but don't want to
mess with the stylesheet. '--fader: .1' defines the variable
for that instance of the li -->
<li style="--fader: .1;">Thing 1</li>
<li style="--fader: .2;">Thing 2</li>
<li style="--fader: .3;">Thing 3</li>
<li style="--fader: .4;">Thing 4</li>
<li style="--fader: .5;">Thing 5</li>
</ul>
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43539203/use-css-counter-in-calc