I'm trying to set up a zero matrix of variable length with two columns into which I can output the results of a while loop (with the intention of using it to store the step data from Euler's method with adjusted time-steps). The length will be determined by the number of iterations of the loop.
I'm wondering if there's a way I can do this while I'm running the loop or whether I need to set it up to begin with, and how to go about doing that.
if the number of columns is fixed you can always add rows to your matrix (inside the loop)
e.g.
while (....)
.....
new_row =[x y] ; % new row with values x & y
mat = [mat ; new_row];
of course if you know the number of iterations before the while loop it's more efficient to pre-allocate the matrix
Another approach that has performance in mind while still trying to be space-efficient, is to preallocate memory in large batches, adding more batches as needed. This is well suited if you have to add a large number of items without knowing how many beforehand.
BLOCK_SIZE = 2000; % initial capacity (& increment size)
listSize = BLOCK_SIZE; % current list capacity
list = zeros(listSize, 2); % actual list
listPtr = 1; % pointer to last free position
while rand<1-1e-5 % (around 1e5 iterations on avrg)
% push items on list
list(listPtr,:) = [rand rand]; % store new item
listPtr = listPtr + 1; % increment position pointer
% add new block of memory if needed
if( listPtr+(BLOCK_SIZE/10) > listSize ) % less than 10%*BLOCK_SIZE free slots
listSize = listSize + BLOCK_SIZE; % add new BLOCK_SIZE slots
list(listPtr+1:listSize,:) = 0;
end
end
list(listPtr:end,:) = []; % remove unused slots
EDIT: As a time comparison, consider the following cases:
- The same code as above done for 50000 iterations.
- Preallocating the entire matrix beforehand:
list = zeros(50000,2); list(k,:) = [x y];
- Dynamically adding vectors to matrix:
list = []; list(k,:) = [x y];
On my machine, the results were:
1) Elapsed time is 0.080214 seconds.
2) Elapsed time is 0.065513 seconds.
3) Elapsed time is 24.433315 seconds.
Update:
Following discussions in the comments, I've rerun some tests using the latest R2014b release. The conclusion is that recent versions of MATLAB has greatly improved the performance of automatic array growth!
However there is a catch; the array must be growing across the last dimension (columns in the case of 2D matrices). That's why appending rows like originally intended is still too slow without preallocation. This is where the above proposed solution can really help (by extending the array in batches).
See here for the full set of tests: https://gist.github.com/amroamroamro/0f104986796f2e0aa618
MATLAB uses dynamic typing with automatic memory management. This means, you don't need to declare a matrix of a fixed size before using it - you can change it as you go along and MATLAB will dynamically allocate memory for you.
BUT it is way more efficient to allocate memory for the matrix first and then use it. But if your programs needs this kind of flexibility, go for it.
I'm guessing you need to keep appending rows to your matrix. The following code should work.
Matrix = [];
while size(Matrix,1) <= 10
Matrix = [Matrix;rand(1,2)];
end
disp(Matrix);
Here, we're dynamically reallocating the space required for Matrix
every time you add a new row. If you know beforehand, say, an upper bound on the number of rows you're going to have, you can declare Matrix = zeros(20,2)
and then insert each row into the matrix incrementally.
% Allocate space using the upper bound of rows (20)
Matrix = zeros(20,2);
k = 1;
for k = 1:10
Matrix(k,:) = rand(1,2);
end
% Remove the rest of the dummy rows
Matrix(k+1:end,:) = [];
Another flavor of the same thing that Jacob posted.
for counter = 1:10
Matrix(counter,:) = rand(1,2);
end
disp(Matrix);
One "nice" thing about this is you can guess a minimum size to help the performance along.
This might be of interest as well: http://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/math/resizing-and-reshaping-matrices.html#f1-88760
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1548116/matrix-of-unknown-length-in-matlab