This question already has an answer here:
I have come across the following script which checks whether an element has class a
, and if not, adds it:
if (!$("div").hasClass("a")){
$("div").addClass("a");
}
As jQuery won't add the class if it already exists, this could be changed to:
$("div").addClass("a");
However, is there any performance improvements by using hasClass
first, or is this using the same method which addClass
does anyway, and therefore duplicating the logic?
The .hasClass()
check is not useful because jQuery will also always check from within .addClass()
. It's just extra work.
You can see at the source code : https://github.com/jquery/jquery/blob/master/src/attributes/classes.js#L38-L45 that they do check if the class exists when using addClass
.
So there is no reason to use the .hasClass()
in this case.. (an exception would be if you wanted to perform more actions if the element did not have the class..)
For what it's worth, there is a performance improvement with .hasClass()
in my limited testing: http://jsperf.com/jquery-hasclass-vs-addclass-and-removeclass
However, even when standalone .removeClass()
reports several times slower in Chrome, it comes in at approximately 70,000 operations a second.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13358887/should-i-use-hasclass-before-addclass