Traversable
is in a sense the class of containers whose structure has a “path” (that can correspond to a list), the elements on which can be modified without dissolving the structure. Hence
zipTrav :: Traversable t => t a -> [b] -> Maybe (t (a,b))
zipTrav = evalStateT . traverse zp
where zp a = do
bs <- get
case bs of
[] -> lift Nothing
(b:bs') -> put bs' >> return (a,b)
However, that list-state traversal seems a bit hackish and likely not the most efficient way to do it. I'd suppose there would be a standard function that accomplished the above or a more general task, but I can't figure out what it would be.
What about mapAccumL
/mapAccumR
?
tzipWith :: Traversable t => (a -> b -> c) -> [a] -> t b -> Maybe (t c)
tzipWith f xs = sequenceA . snd . mapAccumL pair xs
where pair [] y = ([], Nothing)
pair (x:xs) y = (xs, Just (f x y))
tzip :: Traversable t => [a] -> t b -> Maybe (t (a, b))
tzip = tzipWith (,)
ghci> tzip [1..] [4,5,6]
Just [(1,4),(2,5),(3,6)]
ghci> tzip [1,2] [4,5,6]
Nothing
On the question of efficiency - under the hood the mapAccum
functions use the state monad, so all I've really done is capture the imperative part of your code in a higher-order function. I wouldn't expect this code to perform better than yours. But I don't think you can do much better than the State
monad (or ST
), given only Traversable t
.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41522422/whats-the-most-standard-generic-way-to-zip-a-traversable-with-a-list