问题
I am interested in creating a 3D visualization of network packets. A few years ago these things sold for tens of thousands of dollars, but now I think that I can hack one together in a few hours using an open source 3D kit.
I've looked around and have found two kids that look good --- one is Panda3D and the other is CrystalSpace.
My requirements are:
- Fast to learn
- Able to run from python or C++
- Able to work with 50,000 polygons. (I want to represent each packet as a little brick in 3D space.)
This visualization doesn't need to run in a browser.
So I'm looking for advice. My questions:
- Which is better for my application, Panda3D or CrystalSpace 3D?
- Is there another engine that I should be looking at instead?
Thanks.
回答1:
If you want to get something going in only a few hours I think your only viable option is Visual Python. It is much faster than Panda3d/Python for large quantities of primitives and has a much easier API. It does not have an option to work from C++ but since it is a very thin wrapper of a C++ back end I don't think you would be able to add too much performance dropping the Python. I can compute and display 8000 lit/shaded rotating boxes at 15fps on my system.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6523598/best-for-3d-network-visualization-panda3d-or-crystal-space-3d