问题
I need to send a request to multi-servers to see which server will response to my request and if any of them response, I will then further interact with this server. The simplest way is to send my request in sequence, something like this
async function probing(servers) {
for (const server of servers) {
const result = await fetch(server)
if (result.status == 200) {
return result
}
}
}
But I hope to speed up the probing process so I change my code to
async function probing(servers) {
results = await Promise.all(
servers.map(async server => {
return await fetch(server)
})
)
for (const result of results) {
if (result.status == 200) return result
}
}
But I still need to await all of promises to finish. What I really need is just if one of them has resolve I then return from my probing()
Is that possbile ?
---- update ----
Thank for the comments promise.any is the solution (and one-liner arrow function can be further simplified as following)
result = await Promise.any(
servers.map(server => fetch(server))
)
---- update 2 ----
I had thought Promise.any is the way to go and the end of the story. But unfortunately it is not! Promise.any is only available from Chrome 85+ & FF 79+, unlike Promise.all is available for any modern browser except for IE, check here https://v8.dev/features/promise-combinators
And my client needs me to support Chrome version from 2020, i.e. Chrome 80+, I tried to polyfill Promise.any with Babel but I failed.
We use babel6 and I failed to polyfill Promise.any with babel6. I tried to upgraded to babel7 (with npx babel-upgrade --write
and some twists) and now the bundled code using Promise.any() can't even work for chrome 88. I asked another question for that How do I polyfill Promise.any() using babel 7?
So now I just have to revert to Promise.all.
---- update 3 ----
I finally made polyfill Promise.any()
with Babel 7 work, the key is to using core-js@3
with correct babelrc setting (I am not sure I got them all correct), please refer to my question and answer there.
回答1:
In this case Promise.race()
looks reasonable but the problem with Promise.race()
is any rejecting promise in the race will collapse the whole race. If what we want is to ignore the individual rejections and carry on with the race then we still have an option in which case only if all promises gets rejected we have to perform an action to handle the error.
So if we invent the Promise.invert()
and use it with Promise.all() then we get what we want.
var invert = pr => pr.then(v => Promise.reject(v), x => Promise.resolve(x));
Lets see how we can use it;
var invert = pr => pr.then(v => Promise.reject(v), x => Promise.resolve(x)),
random = r => ~~(Math.random()*r),
rndPromise = msg => random(10) < 3 ? Promise.reject("Problem..!!!")
: new Promise((v,x) => setTimeout(v,random(1000),msg)),
promises = Array.from({length: 4}, (_,i) => rndPromise(`Promise # ${i}.. The winner.`));
Promise.all(promises.map(pr => invert(pr)))
.then(e => console.log(`Error ${e} happened..!!`))
.catch(v => console.log(`First successfully resolving promise is: ${v}`));
So since the promises are inverted now catch
is the place that we handle the result while then
is the place for eror handling.
I think you can safely use this in production code provided you well comment this code block for anybody reading in future.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66044132/is-it-possible-to-break-away-from-await-promise-all-when-any-promise-has-fulfill