问题
In Elixir, what would be an efficient way to filter a Map
by its values.
Right now I have the following solution
%{foo: "bar", biz: nil, baz: 4}
|> Enum.reject(fn {_, v} -> is_nil(v) end)
|> Map.new
This solution seems pretty inefficient to me. When called on a Map
, Enum.reject/2
returns a Keywords
. Since I want a Map
, I need to call Map.new/1
to convert that Keywords
back to me.
This seems inefficient because Enum.reject/2
has to iterate over the Map
once and then presumably, Map.new/1
has to iterate over the Keywords
another time.
What would be a more efficient solution?
回答1:
You can use :maps.filter/2
, which filters a map and does not create any intermediate list:
iex(1)> :maps.filter fn _, v -> v != nil end, %{foo: "bar", biz: nil, baz: 4}
%{baz: 4, foo: "bar"}
A simple benchmark confirms this is faster than Enum.filter
+ Map.new
:
map = for i <- 1..100000, into: %{}, do: {i, Enum.random([nil, 1, 2])}
IO.inspect :timer.tc(fn ->
map
|> Enum.reject(fn {_, v} -> is_nil(v) end)
|> Map.new
end)
IO.inspect :timer.tc(fn ->
:maps.filter fn _, v -> v != nil end, map
end)
{44728,
%{48585 => 1, 60829 => 2, 12995 => 1, 462 => 2, 704 => 2, 28954 => 2,
29635 => 2, 78798 => 1, 92572 => 1, 89750 => 2, 39389 => 2, 62855 => 2,
79313 => 1, 92062 => 2, 61871 => 1, 92856 => 2, 75920 => 1, 59922 => 1,
37912 => 2, 30420 => 2, 51211 => 2, 7994 => 2, 78269 => 2, 9765 => 2,
38352 => 2, 6653 => 1, 82555 => 2, 54031 => 2, 45138 => 1, 41351 => 1,
40746 => 1, 5961 => 1, 66704 => 2, 33823 => 1, 47603 => 1, 86873 => 1,
81009 => 2, 96255 => 1, 36219 => 1, 1328 => 2, 33314 => 1, 54477 => 2,
40189 => 2, 27028 => 1, 31676 => 1, 94037 => 1, 32388 => 1, 4351 => 1,
46309 => 1, ...}}
{28638,
%{48585 => 1, 60829 => 2, 12995 => 1, 462 => 2, 704 => 2, 28954 => 2,
29635 => 2, 78798 => 1, 92572 => 1, 89750 => 2, 39389 => 2, 62855 => 2,
79313 => 1, 92062 => 2, 61871 => 1, 92856 => 2, 75920 => 1, 59922 => 1,
37912 => 2, 30420 => 2, 51211 => 2, 7994 => 2, 78269 => 2, 9765 => 2,
38352 => 2, 6653 => 1, 82555 => 2, 54031 => 2, 45138 => 1, 41351 => 1,
40746 => 1, 5961 => 1, 66704 => 2, 33823 => 1, 47603 => 1, 86873 => 1,
81009 => 2, 96255 => 1, 36219 => 1, 1328 => 2, 33314 => 1, 54477 => 2,
40189 => 2, 27028 => 1, 31676 => 1, 94037 => 1, 32388 => 1, 4351 => 1,
46309 => 1, ...}}
回答2:
In this case comprehension would be a good idea, because it also does not create an intermediate list and returns you a map:
map = %{baz: 4, biz: nil, foo: "bar"}
for {key, value} <- map, !is_nil(value), into: %{}, do: {key, value}
回答3:
It could be a little expensive but it is more declarative, which IMO adds more value. Also consider how big is going to be your collection and if it makes sense to optimize this filter.
However, I understand your concern, so here is what I did:
%{foo: "bar", biz: nil, baz: 4}
|> Enum.reduce(%{}, filter_nil_values/2)
Where filter_nil_values/2
is defined as
defp filter_nil_values({_k, nil}, accum), do: accum
defp filter_nil_values({k, v}, accum), do: Map.put(accum, k, v)
I tried to do this in a one-line function, but it looks awful.
回答4:
You can also write like this:
m = %{foo: "bar", biz: nil, baz: 4}
Enum.reduce(m, m, fn
{key, nil}, acc -> Map.delete(acc, key)
{_, _}, acc -> acc
end)
The code above is quite efficient if there are few nil
values in m
.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44145893/efficient-way-to-filter-a-map-by-value-in-elixir