为什么静态变量被认为是邪恶的？

问题：

I am a Java programmer who is new to the corporate world. 我是一位Java程序员，对公司领域来说是新手。 Recently I've developed an application using Groovy and Java. 最近，我已经使用Groovy和Java开发了一个应用程序。 All through the code I wrote used quite a good number of statics. 我编写的所有代码都使用了大量的静态变量。 I was asked by the senior technical lot to cut down on the number of statics used. 高级技术人员要求我减少使用的静电数量。 I've googled about the same, and I find that many programmers are fairly against using static variables. 我已经在谷歌上搜索了相同的内容，并且发现许多程序员都反对使用静态变量。

I find static variables more convenient to use. 我发现静态变量更易于使用。 And I presume that they are efficient too (please correct me if I am wrong), because if I had to make 10,000 calls to a function within a class, I would be glad to make the method static and use a straightforward Class.methodCall() on it instead of cluttering the memory with 10,000 instances of the class, right? 而且我认为它们也是有效的（如果我错了，请纠正我），因为如果我必须对一个类中的函数进行10,000次调用，我将很高兴使该方法静态化并使用简单的Class.methodCall() ，而不是使该类的10,000个实例混乱，对吗？

Moreover statics reduce the inter-dependencies on the other parts of the code. 而且，静态函数减少了对代码其他部分的相互依赖。 They can act as perfect state holders. 他们可以充当完美的国家拥有者。 Adding to this I find that statics are widely implemented in some languages like Smalltalk and Scala . 除此之外，我发现在诸如Smalltalk和Scala的某些语言中广泛实现了静态方法。 So why is this oppression for statics prevalent among programmers (especially in the world of Java)? 那么，为什么在程序员中（尤其是在Java世界中）普遍存在对静态的这种压迫？