It seems that these 2 functions are pretty similar. They have same signature (accepting rx.functions.Func1<? super T, ? extends Observable<? extends R>> func
), and their marble diagrams look exactly same. Can't paste the pics here, but here's one for concatMap, and here's one for flatMap. There seems to be some subtle difference in the description of resulting Observable
, where one produced by concatMap
contains items that result from concatinating resulting Observables, and the one produced by flatMap
contains items that result from first merging the resulting Observables, and emitting the result of that merger.
However, this subtlety is totally unclear to me. Can anyone give a better explanation of this difference, and ideally give some examples illustrating this difference.
As you wrote, the two functions are very similar and the subtle difference is how the output is created ( after the mapping function is applied).
Flat map uses merge operator while concatMap uses concat operator.
As you see the concatMap output sequence is ordered - all of the items emitted by the first Observable being emitted before any of the items emitted by the second Observable,
while flatMap output sequence is merged - the items emitted by the merged Observable may appear in any order, regardless of which source Observable they came from.
One very important difference: the concatMap
waits for the current emitted observable to complete and flatMap
doesn't. flatMap
tries to start as many possible. Simply said - you cannot concatenate something infinite. Just make sure that the observables you emit in concatMap
can complete, otherwise the whole flow will get stuck waiting for the current observable to complete to concatenate the next one.
Even though the answers here are good it wasn't easy to spot the difference without an example. So, I created a simple example for this:
@Test
public void flatMapVsConcatMap() throws Exception {
System.out.println("******** Using flatMap() *********");
Observable.range(1, 15)
.flatMap(item -> Observable.just(item).delay(1, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS))
.subscribe(x -> System.out.print(x + " "));
Thread.sleep(100);
System.out.println("\n******** Using concatMap() *********");
Observable.range(1, 15)
.concatMap(item -> Observable.just(item).delay(1, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS))
.subscribe(x -> System.out.print(x + " "));
Thread.sleep(100);
}
******** Using flatMap() *********
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 8 11 13 15 10 12 14
******** Using concatMap() *********
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
As it could be seen from the output, the results for flatMap
are unordered while for concatMap
they're.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24571491/what-is-the-difference-between-concatmap-and-flatmap-in-rxjava