问题
I have generic class
public abstract class BaseAdapter<T> extends RecyclerView.Adapter {
private List<T> itemsList = new ArrayList<>();
//other override methods
@Override
public long getItemId(int position) {
return position;
}
}
What is the correct way to implementing getItemId()? I think that return position
like in many example is not correct.
回答1:
Create a base interface that has a method that returns a type
long
eg.interface BaseInterface{ long getId(); }
Change
abstract class BaseAdapter<T> extends RecyclerView.Adapter
to
abstract class BaseAdapter<T extends BaseInterface> extends RecyclerView.Adapter {
Note: The signature changed to
T extends BaseInterface
Replace
@Override public long getItemId(int position) { return position; }
with
@Override public long getItemId(int position) { return itemsList.get(position).getId(); }
回答2:
In the List you could only return the Id of the Item available at specific row as mentioned by Google documents:
getItemId
Get the row id associated with the specified position in the list.
But that's not the case with RecyclerView, in RecyclerView you have to ensure that you either return a unique Id for each Item or In case of no Stable Id you should return RecyclerView.NO_ID
(-1). Please Refrain from returning values that are not stable. (An Stable value would be a unique value that does not change even if position of dataset changes)
回答3:
you should implement this methode:
as you see you must tell the Adapter that you implemented that by setHasStableIds(true);
class MyAdapter extends RecyclerView.Adapter<MyAdapter.MyViewHolder> {
MyAdapter() {
setHasStableIds(true); // **very importent**
}
@Override
public long getItemId(int position) {
// requires static value, it means need to keep the same value
// even if the item position has been changed.
return mItems.get(position).getId();
}
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42646950/the-correct-way-of-implementing-getitemid-in-recyclerview-adapter