Issues with CORS in ASP.NET

问题

I have this App where I would like to set my custom headers in the Web.Config, alas this is not always fool proof.

  <customHeaders>
    <add name="Access-Control-Allow-Origin" value="*" />
    <add name="Access-Control-Allow-Methods" value="*" />
    <add name="Access-Control-Allow-Headers" value="*" />
  </customHeaders>

The above set and iterations of it such as

  <customHeaders>
    <add name="Access-Control-Allow-Origin" value="*" />
    <add name="Access-Control-Allow-Methods" value="OPTIONS,GET,PUT,DELETE,POST" />
    <add name="Access-Control-Allow-Headers" value="Authorization,Content-Type" />
  </customHeaders>

has not worked worked for me in all scenario's. As of now this setting works in about 50% of the test machines and gives 405 Method Not Allowed in others.

The alternative is set this in WebApiConfig.cs and uncomment the custom headers in Web.config.

//Web API Cross origin requests - Enable
  var cors = new EnableCorsAttribute("*", "*", "*");
  config.EnableCors(cors);

Why is there so much ambiguity in this and how do I know for sure where CORS will work all the time? I am really interested in setting CORS on Web.config only as I would like the flexibility of modifying it in the deployed version.

回答1:

I believe that your 'random' issue occurs because you are not handling the preflight Options requests for PUT and Delete verbs.

For the two verbs mentioned above an extra request is generated, Options, to which Web API needs to respond in order to confirm that it is indeed configured to support CORS.

To handle this, all you need to do is send an empty response back. You can do this inside your actions, or you can do it globally like this:

protected void Application_BeginRequest()
{
    if (Request.Headers.AllKeys.Contains("Origin") && Request.HttpMethod == "OPTIONS")
    {
        Response.Flush();
    }
}

This extra check was added to ensure that old APIs that were designed to accept only GET and POST requests will not be exploited. Imagine sending a DELETE request to an API designed when this verb didn't exist. The outcome is unpredictable and the results might be dangerous.

Also, in web.config, you should specify the methods instead of using *

<httpProtocol>
  <customHeaders>
    <add name="Access-Control-Allow-Origin" value="*" />
    <add name="Access-Control-Allow-Headers" value="Content-Type" />
    <add name="Access-Control-Allow-Methods" value="GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS" />
  </customHeaders>
 </httpProtocol>

回答2:

There is no ambiguity with CORS, you have a few cases that you need to think about

1- if you want to enable CORS for your Web APIs only use "Microsoft.AspNet.WebApi.Cors" library.

2- if you want to enable CORS for the whole website (including the Web APIs, SignalR, ..etc ) use "Microsoft.Owin.Cors" library.

using any library from the above 2 will definitely work and cors will be enabled, now if you want to configure the urls, you can do that from your database/config file, so when your application starts the url that you pass to the EnableCors for example can come from the database/config file, but the bottom line is to avoid adding any cors headers to the web.config.

To know to enable CORS for your Web API, you can have a look to my article here, which enables CORS for the Web APIs and use it from AngularJS client.

Hope that helps.

回答3:

For anyone reading this, this may help.

Even with the following startup code

var cors = new EnableCorsAttribute("*", "*", "GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS");
config.EnableCors(cors);

I had to explcitly add the verbs to the Web Api action method:

[Route("sanity")]
[HttpOptions]
[HttpPost]
public List<PostImportView> Sanity(SanityFilter filter)
{
    ....

Pretty pointless and annoying

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27373165/issues-with-cors-in-asp-net