问题
I've written some Perl code which compose two classes inherent from a base one. I suppose it would print something like this
Mik: Meow! Meow!
Sat: Woof! Woof!
But it actually print this way:
Sat: Woof! Woof!
Sat: Woof! Woof!
,
package Animal;
sub new {
my $obj = shift;
my $name = shift;
our %pkg = ( 'name' => $name );
bless \%pkg, $obj;
return \%pkg;
}
package Cat;
@ISA = ("Animal");
sub new {
my $obj = shift;
my $name = shift;
my $self = $obj->SUPER::new($name);
return $self;
}
sub get_name {
my $obj = shift;
return $obj->{'name'};
}
sub talk {
my $obj = shift;
return "Meow! Meow!";
}
package Dog;
@ISA = ("Animal");
sub new {
my $obj = shift;
my $name = shift;
my $self = $obj->SUPER::new( $name );
return $self;
}
sub get_name {
my $obj = shift;
return $obj->{'name'};
}
sub talk {
my $obj = shift;
return "Woof! Woof!";
}
package Main;
my $cat = new Cat('Mike');
my $dog = new Dog('Sat');
print $cat->get_name() . ": " . $cat->talk() , "\n";
print $dog->get_name() . ": " . $dog->talk() , "\n";
But if I change the caller in this way, it prints what I suppose to be. So it is quite strange why the $cat
object was overwritten after the $dog
was instantiated?
package Main;
my $cat = new Cat('Mily');
print $cat->get_name() . ": " . $cat->talk() , "\n";
my $dog = new Dog('Sat');
print $dog->get_name() . ": " . $dog->talk() , "\n";
回答1:
Why do you bless into a global variable? Change your constructor to:
sub new {
my $obj = shift;
my $name = shift;
my %pkg = ( 'name' => $name );
bless \%pkg, $obj;
return \%pkg;
}
Better yet, change it to something more idiomatic:
sub new {
my $class = shift;
my $name = shift;
my $self = { name => $name };
return bless $self, $class;
}
Moving on:
Why implement new
and get_name
in each kind of animal? Both methods can be inherited. While we're at it, we might as well get rid off the messing around with @ISA
:
package Animal;
sub new {
my $class = shift;
my $name = shift;
my $self = { name => $name };
return bless $self, $class;
}
sub get_name {
my $self = shift;
return $self->{'name'};
}
package Cat;
use base qw/ Animal /;
sub talk {
my $self = shift;
return "Meow! Meow!";
}
package Dog;
use base qw/ Animal /;
sub talk {
my $self = shift;
return "Woof! Woof!";
}
package Main;
my $cat = Cat->new('Mike');
my $dog = Dog->new('Sat');
print $cat->get_name() . ": " . $cat->talk() , "\n";
print $dog->get_name() . ": " . $dog->talk() , "\n";
May I ask which tutorial or book you are following?
While the above is perfectly fine, you might as well do it the Modern Perl way:
package Animal;
use Moose;
has name => ( required => 1, is => 'rw', isa => 'Str' );
package Cat;
use Moose;
extends 'Animal';
has talk => ( default => "Meow! Meow!", is => 'ro' );
package Dog;
use Moose;
extends 'Animal';
has talk => ( default => "Woof! Woof!", is => 'ro' );
package Main;
my $cat = Cat->new( name => 'Mike');
my $dog = Dog->new( name => 'Sat');
print $cat->name . ": " . $cat->talk , "\n";
print $dog->name . ": " . $dog->talk , "\n";
回答2:
You have declared the variable to store the instance data using
our %pkg
This is an alias for a single data structure (%Animal::pkg
), so all your objects are using the same hash. Change our
to my
in order to create a new hash each time.
It might be worth noting that "inside-out" objects in Perl can and do use a shared data structure in the package to store instance data, but there is an additional level of abstraction required to make that work, and I wouldn't recommend starting OO Perl with them, they are an acquired taste.
回答3:
In a nutshell: our
declares package variables, so every time our %pkg = (...)
is executed, you assign a new value to the same variable. As all \%pkg
references point to the same var, all return values of new
are the same object. A reference can only be blessed into one class, so the last one wins.
Just change the our
to my
, and it should work as expected.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17472783/why-does-perl-object-instance-overwrite-each-other