What I was trying to achieve, was something like this:
>>> camel_case_split("CamelCaseXYZ")
['Camel', 'Case', 'XYZ']
>>> camel_case_split("XYZCamelCase")
['XYZ', 'Camel', 'Case']
So I searched and found this perfect regular expression:
(?<=[a-z])(?=[A-Z])|(?<=[A-Z])(?=[A-Z][a-z])
As the next logical step I tried:
>>> re.split("(?<=[a-z])(?=[A-Z])|(?<=[A-Z])(?=[A-Z][a-z])", "CamelCaseXYZ")
['CamelCaseXYZ']
Why does this not work, and how do I achieve the result from the linked question in python?
Edit: Solution summary
I tested all provided solutions with a few test cases:
string: ''
AplusKminus: ['']
casimir_et_hippolyte: []
two_hundred_success: []
kalefranz: string index out of range # with modification: either [] or ['']
string: ' '
AplusKminus: [' ']
casimir_et_hippolyte: []
two_hundred_success: [' ']
kalefranz: [' ']
string: 'lower'
all algorithms: ['lower']
string: 'UPPER'
all algorithms: ['UPPER']
string: 'Initial'
all algorithms: ['Initial']
string: 'dromedaryCase'
AplusKminus: ['dromedary', 'Case']
casimir_et_hippolyte: ['dromedary', 'Case']
two_hundred_success: ['dromedary', 'Case']
kalefranz: ['Dromedary', 'Case'] # with modification: ['dromedary', 'Case']
string: 'CamelCase'
all algorithms: ['Camel', 'Case']
string: 'ABCWordDEF'
AplusKminus: ['ABC', 'Word', 'DEF']
casimir_et_hippolyte: ['ABC', 'Word', 'DEF']
two_hundred_success: ['ABC', 'Word', 'DEF']
kalefranz: ['ABCWord', 'DEF']
In summary you could say the solution by @kalefranz does not match the question (see the last case) and the solution by @casimir et hippolyte eats a single space, and thereby violates the idea that a split should not change the individual parts. The only difference among the remaining two alternatives is that my solution returns a list with the empty string on an empty string input and the solution by @200_success returns an empty list. I don't know how the python community stands on that issue, so I say: I am fine with either one. And since 200_success's solution is simpler, I accepted it as the correct answer.
As @AplusKminus has explained, re.split() never splits on an empty pattern match. Therefore, instead of splitting, you should try finding the components you are interested in.
Here is a solution using re.finditer() that emulates splitting:
def camel_case_split(identifier):
matches = finditer('.+?(?:(?<=[a-z])(?=[A-Z])|(?<=[A-Z])(?=[A-Z][a-z])|$)', identifier)
return [m.group(0) for m in matches]
Use re.sub() and split()
import re
name = 'CamelCaseTest123'
splitted = re.sub('([A-Z][a-z]+)', r' \1', re.sub('([A-Z]+)', r' \1', name)).split()
Result
'CamelCaseTest123' -> ['Camel', 'Case', 'Test123']
'CamelCaseXYZ' -> ['Camel', 'Case', 'XYZ']
'XYZCamelCase' -> ['XYZ', 'Camel', 'Case']
'XYZ' -> ['XYZ']
'IPAddress' -> ['IP', 'Address']
Most of the time when you don't need to check the format of a string, a global research is more simple than a split (for the same result):
re.findall(r'[A-Z](?:[a-z]+|[A-Z]*(?=[A-Z]|$))', 'CamelCaseXYZ')
returns
['Camel', 'Case', 'XYZ']
To deal with dromedary too, you can use:
re.findall(r'[A-Z]?[a-z]+|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$)', 'camelCaseXYZ')
Note: (?=[A-Z]|$) can be shorten using a double negation (a negative lookahead with a negated character class): (?![^A-Z])
The documentation for python's re.split says:
Note that split will never split a string on an empty pattern match.
When seeing this:
>>> re.findall("(?<=[a-z])(?=[A-Z])|(?<=[A-Z])(?=[A-Z][a-z])", "CamelCaseXYZ")
['', '']
it becomes clear, why the split does not work as expected. The remodule finds empty matches, just as intended by the regular expression.
Since the documentation states that this is not a bug, but rather intended behavior, you have to work around that when trying to create a camel case split:
def camel_case_split(identifier):
matches = finditer('(?<=[a-z])(?=[A-Z])|(?<=[A-Z])(?=[A-Z][a-z])', identifier)
split_string = []
# index of beginning of slice
previous = 0
for match in matches:
# get slice
split_string.append(identifier[previous:match.start()])
# advance index
previous = match.start()
# get remaining string
split_string.append(identifier[previous:])
return split_string
I just stumbled upon this case and wrote a regular expression to solve it. It should work for any group of words, actually.
RE_WORDS = re.compile(r'''
# Find words in a string. Order matters!
[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z][a-z]) | # All upper case before a capitalized word
[A-Z]?[a-z]+ | # Capitalized words / all lower case
[A-Z]+ | # All upper case
\d+ # Numbers
''', re.VERBOSE)
The key here is the lookahead on the first possible case. It will match (and preserve) uppercase words before capitalized ones:
assert RE_WORDS.findall('FOOBar') == ['FOO', 'Bar']
Here's another solution that requires less code and no complicated regular expressions:
def camel_case_split(string):
bldrs = [[string[0].upper()]]
for c in string[1:]:
if bldrs[-1][-1].islower() and c.isupper():
bldrs.append([c])
else:
bldrs[-1].append(c)
return [''.join(bldr) for bldr in bldrs]
Edit
The above code contains an optimization that avoids rebuilding the entire string with every appended character. Leaving out that optimization, a simpler version (with comments) might look like
def camel_case_split2(string):
# set the logic for creating a "break"
def is_transition(c1, c2):
return c1.islower() and c2.isupper()
# start the builder list with the first character
# enforce upper case
bldr = [string[0].upper()]
for c in string[1:]:
# get the last character in the last element in the builder
# note that strings can be addressed just like lists
previous_character = bldr[-1][-1]
if is_transition(previous_character, c):
# start a new element in the list
bldr.append(c)
else:
# append the character to the last string
bldr[-1] += c
return bldr
I know that the question added the tag of regex. But still, I always try to stay as far away from regex as possible. So, here is my solution without regex:
def split_camel(text, char):
if len(text) <= 1: # To avoid adding a wrong space in the beginning
return text+char
if char.isupper() and text[-1].islower(): # Regular Camel case
return text + " " + char
elif text[-1].isupper() and char.islower() and text[-2] != " ": # Detect Camel case in case of abbreviations
return text[:-1] + " " + text[-1] + char
else: # Do nothing part
return text + char
text = "PathURLFinder"
text = reduce(split_camel, a, "")
print text
# prints "Path URL Finder"
print text.split(" ")
# prints "['Path', 'URL', 'Finder']"
EDIT: As suggested, here is the code to put the functionality in a single function.
def split_camel(text):
def splitter(text, char):
if len(text) <= 1: # To avoid adding a wrong space in the beginning
return text+char
if char.isupper() and text[-1].islower(): # Regular Camel case
return text + " " + char
elif text[-1].isupper() and char.islower() and text[-2] != " ": # Detect Camel case in case of abbreviations
return text[:-1] + " " + text[-1] + char
else: # Do nothing part
return text + char
converted_text = reduce(splitter, text, "")
return converted_text.split(" ")
split_camel("PathURLFinder")
# prints ['Path', 'URL', 'Finder']
I think below is the optimim
Def count_word(): Return(re.findall(‘[A-Z]?[a-z]+’, input(‘please enter your string’))
Print(count_word())
I found regexp complicated to build, hard to debug and with unpredictable execution speed. I like to use them in the search/replace function of my IDE but I try to avoid them in programs.
Here is a quite straightforward solution in pure python:
def camel_case_split(s):
idx = [0] + [i for i, e in enumerate(s) if e.isupper()] + [len(s)]
return [s[x:y] for x, y in zip(idx, idx[1:]) if x < y]
And some tests :
def test():
TESTS = [
("CamelCaseWordT", ['Camel', 'Case', 'Word', 'T']),
("CamelCaseWordTa", ['Camel', 'Case', 'Word', 'Ta']),
("aCamelCaseWordTa", ['a', 'Camel', 'Case', 'Word', 'Ta']),
("aCamelCaseWordT", ['a', 'Camel', 'Case', 'Word', 'T']),
("Ta", ['Ta']),
("aT", ['a', 'T']),
("a", ['a']),
("T", ['T']),
("", []),
]
for (q,a) in TESTS:
assert camel_case_split(q) == a
if __name__ == "__main__":
test()
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29916065/how-to-do-camelcase-split-in-python