问题
I'm a perl programmer and a new emacs user. I'm under Windows, using cperl-mode for editing perl. Emacs version is 24.2.1. Here's a screenshot with some sample code:
(source: breqwas.net)
- Obvious bug: it highlights arrays, hashes and non-quoted literal values in ( a => "b" ) style lists inside comments
- One more bug: it highligts the first word in a regular expression as an array because of non-default quote symbol
- Not a bug, but looks weird: it highlights arrays and hashes any time when they are used (even in comments, huh), but scalars are highlighted only when declared
- Not a bug, but looks weird: same story with functions: highlighted when declared, not when called
- Not a bug, but looks weird: why do "print", "say" and "system" have different colors?
I could keep going, but I hope that explains the word "broken" pretty well.
Then I learned the magic C-u C-x = key combination, which shows, among other stuff, the text properties for the text under the cursor, hoping to make a better coloring scheme of my own. At this point it started making even less sense.
"print" has cperl-nonoverridable-face. "die" has font-lock-keyword-face. Meanwhile, both are functions and can be (and often are) overrided. "system" has font-lock-type-face. Why? Function declarations have font-lock-function-name-face - that's OK, but so do the arguments of "use". Why? Function calls and scalars don't have face property at all and can't be highlighted. Why? Etc, Etc. Again, I could keep going.
Is there a way to fix all that? Is there some config where I can remap lexical units to some other font-faces, or some other way to make the syntax highlight less crazy?
To avoid the "perl is unparsible" talk, here's a screenshot of the editor I'm migrating from, with the very same code: http://breqwas.net/dropbox/perlsyn_pn.png. Looks much more reasonable.
Upd: By now (3 weeks after asking this question here) I did not find a cure. All perl programmers who use emacs I know just ignore these problems. No better perl highlighters for emacs seem to exist. Reading cperl-mode docs provides some explanations (the choice of faces for various elements seems less crazy now), but does not provide any answers. I wrote an email to cperl-mode maintainer with these questions and some more digging I did, but got no reply.
Yep, you got that right: seems like emacs community was not able to make a good perl syntax highligting in 25 years that perl is around. That's a sad story.
回答1:
You might want to try perl-mode instead of cperl-mode. If you find missing features in it we might be able to port them from cperl-mode without too much trouble. perl-mode's highlighting is less gaudy than cperl-mode's but it does fix some of the problems you point out.
As for "highlighted when declared, not when called" this is because Emacs usually highlights in this way. I find there is zero benefit to highlighting variable and function uses. I kept the highlighting of variable uses in perl-mode mostly because it was there before and I didn't want to deal with disgruntled users. Also, in the case of Perl, it's probably easier to highlight variable declarations and uses identically as does perl-mode whereas cperl-mode has to do extra work to distinguish those two cases.
回答2:
Another syntax highlighting snafu to watch out for with Emacs cperl-mode relates to POD comments used to comment out blocks of code. Here's a screenshot to demo:
It's VERY easy to miss commented out code that uses POD directives without blank line padding as in my 'not recommended' example above. It just does not hit your eye as a comment when viewing it in Emacs, especially if the commented block is large and spans multiple screen pages so that the '=cut' lines aren't even in view.
It's worth noting that vim's Perl mode correctly highlights the POD without requiring blank line padding per the POD spec, though I would caution vim users to avoid relying on that feature and use blank line padding and '=begin comment ...=end comment' directives as shown above and as recommended.
It would be nice if Perl had a simpler multi-line comment syntax a la '/* ... */' rather than the POD mechanism that is subject to abuse. Perhaps we'll get this in Perl 6 some day?
Another way do multi-line comments in Emacs (for any language) is via the 'string-rectangle' built-in: C-x r t then type '# '. To uncomment a block, either do it manually or write a simple macro.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13138932/syntax-highlight-for-perl-in-emacs-is-broken-is-there-a-fix