问题
I have a hashmap with byte[] keys. I'd like to sort it through a TreeMap.
What is the most effective way to implement the comparator for lexicographic order?
回答1:
Using Guava, you can use either of:
- UnsignedBytes.lexicographicalComparator()
- SignedBytes.lexicographicalComparator()
The UnsignedBytes
comparator appears to have an optimized form using Unsafe
that it uses if it can. Comments in the code indicate that it may be at least twice as fast as a normal Java implementation.
回答2:
Found this nice piece of code in Apache Hbase:
public int compare(byte[] left, byte[] right) {
for (int i = 0, j = 0; i < left.length && j < right.length; i++, j++) {
int a = (left[i] & 0xff);
int b = (right[j] & 0xff);
if (a != b) {
return a - b;
}
}
return left.length - right.length;
}
回答3:
I'm assuming the problem is just with the "byte vs. byte" comparison. Dealing with the arrays is straightforward, so I won't cover it. With respect to byte vs. byte, my first thought is to do this:
public class ByteComparator implements Comparator<byte> {
public int compare(byte b1, byte b2) {
return new Byte(b1).compareTo(b2);
}
}
But that won't be lexicographic: 0xFF (the signed byte for -1) will be considered smaller than 0x00, when lexicographically it's bigger. I think this should do the trick:
public class ByteComparator implements Comparator<byte> {
public int compare(byte b1, byte b2) {
// convert to unsigned bytes (0 to 255) before comparing them.
int i1 = b1 < 0 ? 256 + b1 : b1;
int i2 = b2 < 0 ? 256 + b2 : b2;
return i2 - i1;
}
}
Probably there is something in Apache's commons-lang or commons-math libraries that does this, but I don't know it off hand.
回答4:
You can use a comparator which comares the Character.toLowerCase() of each of the bytes in the array (Assuming the byte[] is in ASCII) if not you will need to do the character decoding yourself or use new String(bytes, charSet).toLowerCase()
but this is not likely to be efficient.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5108091/java-comparator-for-byte-array-lexicographic