Can lazy-loaded modules share the same instance of a service provided by their parent?

问题

I've just run into a problem with a lazy-loaded module where parent and child module both require the same service but create an instance each. The declaration is identical for both, that is

import { MyService } from './my.service';
...
@NgModule({
   ...
   providers: [
      MyService,
      ...
   ]
});

and here's the routing setup

export parentRoutes: Routes = [
   { path: ':id', component: ParentComponent, children: [
      { path: '', component: ParentDetailsComponent },
      { path: 'child', loadChildren: 'app/child.module#ChildModule' },
      ...
   ]}
];

which, of course, is then imported in the parent module as

RouterModule.forChild(parentRoutes)

How do I go about this if I wanted to share the same service instance?

回答1:

Using a forRoot, as mentioned here, is what you need probably. The problem it's meant to solve, is directly related to the problem you are experiencing with lazy loaded modules getting their own service.

It's explained here in Configure core services with forRoot, but that section doesn't explain about the lazy-loading issue. That is explained with a little warning at the end of Shared Modules

Do not specify app-wide singleton providers in a shared module. A lazy loaded module that imports that shared module will make its own copy of the service.

@NgModule({})
class SharedModule {
  static forRoot() {
    ngModule: SharedModule,
    providers: [ MyService ]
  }
}

@NgModule({
  import: [ SharedModule.forRoot() ]
})
class AppModule {}

@NgModule({
  imports: [ SharedModule ]
})
class LazyLoadedModule {}

This makes sure that the lazy loaded module doesn't get the service. But whether or not the module is lazy loaded or not, this is the pattern that is recommended for app-wide services. Though it should be noted that if you don't have any lazy loaded module, not using the forRoot patter, and just importing SharedModule, it will only be one instance of the service. But this pattern should still recommended to be followed.

UPDATE

I guess I jumped to quick on answering without fully looking at the question. In the question, there is no mention of any shared module. It seems the OP is simply trying to add the service to the @NgModule.providers in both the app module and the lazy loaded child module.

In this case, simply remove the service from the child module providers. It is not needed. The one added in the app module is enough for the child to be used.

Just remember that providers are app wide (except in the problem case this post is about), while declarations are not.

回答2:

This should work but still I would suggest you to go with SharedModule concept which contains common services,pipes,directives and components.

Shared/SharedModule

import { NgModule,ModuleWithProviders } from '@angular/core';
import { CommonModule }        from '@angular/common';

import { MyService } from './my.service';

@NgModule({
  imports:      [ CommonModule ],
  declarations: [],
  exports:      [ CommonModule ]
})
export class SharedModule {
  static forRoot(): ModuleWithProviders {
    return {
      ngModule: SharedModule,
      providers: [ MyService ]                       //<<<====here
    };
  }
}

AppModule

import {SharedModule} from './shared/shared.module';
...
@NgModule({
   imports:[ BrowserModule,SharedModule.forRoot()],  //<<<====here
   providers: []
});

回答3:

I have a separate layout module with a service, this service needed to work on other feature modules, using lazy load

I was able to solve the problem by exporting the service, straight from the layout module

@NgModule({
    declarations: [...],
    imports: [...],
    exports: [...],
})
export class LayoutModule {
    ...
}

export { LayoutService }

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39672816/can-lazy-loaded-modules-share-the-same-instance-of-a-service-provided-by-their-p

标签

angular

angular2-services