问题
I wrote an API using go and gorm that runs calculations on our database and returns the results.
I just hit the parameter limit for an IN condition when using an aggregate. Example query:
SELECT SUM(total_amount) from Table where user_id in(...70k parameters) group by user_id
One of my current edge cases has > 65535 user ids so my Postgres client is throwing an error:
got 66037 parameters but PostgreSQL only supports 65535 parameters
I'm not sure what the best way to approach this is. One that will handle the large amount of parameters for this edge case while not affecting my typical use case. Do I chunk the ids and iterate through multiple queries storing it in memory until I have all the data I need? Use ANY(VALUES)...
Obviously from the query I have very limited knowledge of Postgres so any help would be incredibly appreciated.
回答1:
You can replace user_id IN (value [, ...]) with one of:
user_id IN (subquery)
user_id = ANY (subquery)
user_id = ANY (array expression)
Neither subqueries nor arrays exhibit the same limitation. The shortest input syntax would be:
user_id = ANY ('{1,2,3}'::int[]) -- make array type match type of user_id
Details and more options:
- How to use ANY instead of IN in a WHERE clause with Rails?
Or you might create a (temporary) table tmp_usr(user_id int), import to it, maybe with SQL COPY or psql \copy instead of INSERT for best performance with very big sets, and then join to the table like:
SELECT SUM(total_amount)
FROM tbl
JOIN tmp_usr USING (user_id)
GROUP BY user_id;
BTW, GROUP BY user_id without including user_id in the SELECT list looks suspicious. May be a simplified example query.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52712022/what-is-the-most-performant-way-to-rewrite-a-large-in-clause