问题
When we have an array with indexes from 0 to n for example. when I use the Binary search using floor or ceiling when calculating the middle index I get the same out put.
int middle = ceiling ((left+right)/2);
Is there a reason using floor over ceiling ? what bug will happen using the ceiling ?
回答1:
There's no difference in complexity. Both variants are log(n).
Depending on the rest of your implementation, you may get a different result if your array looks for instance like
0 1 1 1 1 2
and looking for the index of a 1
.
回答2:
This all depends on how you update your left
and right
variable.
Normally, we use left = middle+1
and right = middle-1
, with stopping criteria left = right
.
In this case, ceiling or flooring the middle value doesn't matter.
However, if we use left = middle+1
and right = middle
, we must take the floor of the middle value, otherwise we end up in an endless loop.
Consider finding 11
in array 11, 22
.
We set left = 0
and right = 1
, the middle is 0.5
, if we take the ceiling, it would be 1
. Since 22
is larger than query, we need to cut the right half and move right boarder towards middle. This works fine when the array is large, but since there are only two elements. right = middle
will again set right
to 1
. We have an infinite loop.
To sum up,
- both ceiling and flooring work fine with
left = middle+1
andright = middle-1
- ceiling works fine with
left = middle
andright = middle-1
- flooring works fine with
left = middle+1
andright = middle
回答3:
If you use the ceiling, this can result in an endless loop if just one element is left, because parting that range will still yield a one-element sequence. Still, you never need the middle element, so after comparison you can reduce the remaining range by that element, which will also cause the loop to terminate.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27655955/why-does-binary-search-algorithm-use-floor-and-not-ceiling-not-in-an-half-open