问题
I'm trying to do some template metaprogramming and I'm finding the need to "extract" the highest index of a specialization of some structure in some type.
For example, if I have some types:
struct A
{
template<unsigned int> struct D;
template<> struct D<0> { };
};
struct B
{
template<unsigned int> struct D;
template<> struct D<0> { };
template<> struct D<1> { };
};
struct C
{
template<unsigned int> struct D;
template<> struct D<0> { };
template<> struct D<1> { };
template<> struct D<2> { };
};
How can I then write a metafunction like this:
template<class T>
struct highest_index
{
typedef ??? type;
// could also be: static size_t const index = ???;
};
to give me the highest-indexed D
that has been specialized inside an arbitrary struct like the ones above, without requiring the struct to have declared the count explicitly?
回答1:
This is the first version which gets you the maximum index for which specialization is defined. From this, you will get the corresponding type!
Implementation:
template<class T>
struct highest_index
{
private:
template<int i>
struct is_defined {};
template<int i>
static char f(is_defined<sizeof(typename T::template D<i>)> *);
template<int i>
static int f(...);
template<int i>
struct get_index;
template<bool b, int j>
struct next
{
static const int value = get_index<j>::value;
};
template<int j>
struct next<false, j>
{
static const int value = j-2;
};
template<int i>
struct get_index
{
static const bool exists = sizeof(f<i>(0)) == sizeof(char);
static const int value = next<exists, i+1>::value;
};
public:
static const int index = get_index<0>::value;
};
Test code:
#include <iostream>
struct A
{
template<unsigned int> struct D;
};
template<> struct A::D<0> { };
template<> struct A::D<1> { };
struct B
{
template<unsigned int> struct D;
};
template<> struct B::D<0> { };
template<> struct B::D<1> { };
template<> struct B::D<2> { };
int main()
{
std::cout << highest_index<A>::index << std::endl;
std::cout << highest_index<B>::index << std::endl;
}
Output:
1
2
Live demo. :-)
回答2:
Figured it out with the help from the comments under the question!
struct A { template<unsigned int> struct D; };
template<> struct A::D<0> { };
struct B { template<unsigned int> struct D; };
template<> struct B::D<0> { };
template<> struct B::D<1> { };
struct C { template<unsigned int> struct D; };
template<> struct C::D<0> { };
template<> struct C::D<1> { };
template<> struct C::D<2> { };
template<> struct C::D<3> { };
template<unsigned int>
static unsigned char test(...);
template<unsigned int N, class T>
static typename enable_if<
sizeof(typename T::template D<N>),
unsigned char (&)[1 + sizeof(test<N + 1>(T()))]
>::type test(T, typename T::template D<N> = typename T::template D<N>());
int main()
{
return sizeof(test<0>(C())) - 1; // Evaluates to number of specializations
}
回答3:
Here is my little contribution.
We start off with the existence methods:
template <unsigned>
static unsigned char exists_impl(...);
template <unsigned N, typename T>
static auto exists_impl(T const&&) ->
typename std::enable_if<sizeof(typename T::template D<N>),
unsigned char (&)[2]>::type;
template <typename T, unsigned N>
static constexpr bool exists() {
return sizeof(exists_impl<N>(std::declval<T>())) != 1;
}
I believe here that constexpr
and function usage do bring a lot to the table in terms of readability, so I don't use the typical types.
Then, we use a typical binary search (2nd attempt, see first attempt at bottom), at a loss of readability, but to benefit from lazy instantiation, we use partial template specialization and std::conditional
:
template <typename T, unsigned low, unsigned high, typename = void>
struct highest_index_in;
template <typename T, unsigned low>
struct highest_index_in<T, low, low>: std::integral_constant<unsigned, low> {};
template <typename T, unsigned low, unsigned high>
struct highest_index_in<T, low, high, typename std::enable_if<(high == low + 1)>::type>:
std::integral_constant<unsigned, low + exists<T, low+1>()> {};
template <typename T, unsigned low, unsigned high>
struct highest_index_in<T, low, high, typename std::enable_if<(high > low + 1)>::type>:
std::conditional< exists<T, (low+high)/2>(),
highest_index_in<T, (low+high)/2, high>,
highest_index_in<T, low, (low+high)/2> >::type
{};
template <typename T>
static constexpr unsigned highest_index() {
return highest_index_in<T, 0, ~(0u)>::value;
} // highest_index
Demo at liveworkspace, computing highest_index<C>()
is near instantaneous.
First attempt at binary search, unfortunately the compiler need instantiate the function bodies recursively (to prove they can be instantiated) and thus the work it has to do is tremendous:
template <typename T, unsigned low, unsigned high>
static constexpr auto highest_index_in() ->
typename std::enable_if<high >= low, unsigned>::type
{
return low == high ? low :
high == low + 1 ? (exists<T, high>() ? high : low) :
exists<T, (high + low)/2>() ? highest_index_in<T, (high+low)/2, high>() :
highest_index_in<T, low, (high+low)/2>();
} // highest_index_in
template <typename T>
static constexpr unsigned highest_index() {
return highest_index_in<T, 0, ~(0u)>();
} // highest_index
So, unfortunately, highest_index
is not usable and the clang is dang slow (not that gcc appears to be doing better).
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14210378/how-to-extract-the-highest-indexed-specialization-from-a-structure