问题
I'm trying to build a generic algorithm. So far I have achieved this using class hierarchy and pointers, as in the example below:
struct Base{
virtual double fn(double x){return 0;}
};
class Derived : public Base{
double A;
public:
Derived(double a) : A(a) {}
double fn(double x) { return A*x;}
};
//Some other implementations
class algo{
double T;
std::unique_ptr<Base> b_ptr;
public:
algo(double t, std::unique_ptr<Base>& _ptr); //move constructor...
//Some constructors
double method(double x){ return T*b_ptr->fn(x);}
};
This set up is then implemented as follows:
int main(){
std::unique_ptr<Derived> ptr(new Derived(5.4));
algo(3.2,ptr);
method(2.4);
return 0;
}
This is a very simple example, of course, but it serves for my question. From what I understand, using derived classes in this way means that the method is chosen at run-time rather than at compile time. Since I do not need any dynamic behaviour from my algorithm - everything is determined at compile time - this is a needless loss of efficiency. Is there a way to do the above at compile time, i.e. static polymorphism?
From what I understand, it's only possible to get static polymorphism using templates. I haven't been able to find a implement templates with non-primitive types, however. As in the example above, I need derived classes with non-default constructors, which doesn't seem to be possible... Could anyone offer any solutions as to how this might be done?
回答1:
Your Base class and Derived seem to represent a function only having a single member function, so we could most likely do away with the polymorphism completely and pass a function into algo:
#include <iostream>
#include <utility>
template <class Function>
class algo
{
double t;
Function fn;
public:
algo(double t, const Function& fn)
: t{t}, fn{fn}
{ }
double method(double x){ return t * fn(x);}
};
template <class Function>
algo<Function> make_algo(double t, Function&& fn)
{
return algo<Function>(t, std::forward<Function>(fn));
}
int main()
{
const double someValue = 123;
const double anotherValue = 987;
auto algo = make_algo(anotherValue, [someValue](double otherValue) {
return someValue * otherValue;
});
std::cout << std::fixed << algo.method(321) << std::endl;
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19109620/c-static-rather-than-dynamic-polymorphism